期刊文献+

关于高校护生评判性思维能力培养的思考 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文的目的是探讨高仿真模拟教学对护生评判性思维的影响。本文选取了浙江海洋大学东海科学技术学院医学院2012级护理本科生146名,在内科护理学和外科护理学开课前和课后一周内,应用评判性思维量表对学生进行测试,并对测试结果进行比较。结果显示:开设高仿真模拟教学课前护生的评判性思维总分为250.77±12.12,课后评判性思维总分及各因子分都明显高于课前。本文的结论是:高仿真模拟教学法有利于培养和提高护生的评判性思维能力。
出处 《管理观察》 2016年第31期140-143,共4页 Management Observer
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献19

  • 1彭美慈,汪国成,陈基乐,陈满辉,白洪海,李守国,李继平,蔡芸芳,王君俏,殷磊.批判性思维能力测量表的信效度测试研究[J].中华护理杂志,2004,39(9):644-647. 被引量:1826
  • 2American Association of College of Nursing. The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice. [2011-09-01 ]. http ://www. aacn. nche. edu/education/baccessn. htm.
  • 3Scot TW.Promoting critical thinking in stu- dents[J]. J Am Acad Nurse Pract,2005,17 (6) :205-206.
  • 4Facione PA, Facione NC, Giancario CAF. The California critical thinking disposition inventory, CCTDI scoring supplement. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press, 2000.
  • 5Facione PA, Facione NC. The California critical thinking disposition inventory (CCTDI). Test administration manual. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press, 1992.
  • 6Ip WY, Lee DTF, Lee IFK, et al. Disposition towards critical thinking: a study of Chinese undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2000, 32(1):84-90.
  • 7Yeh ML. Assessing the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the california critical thinking disposition inventory. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2002, 39(2):123-132.
  • 8Albert RT, Albert RE, Radsma J. Relationships among bilingualism, critical thinking ability, and critical thinking disposition. Journal of Professional Nursing, 2002, 18(4):220-229.
  • 9Chan S. The Chinese learner - a question of style. Education and Training, 1999, 41(6/7):294-304.
  • 10Gao G. ''Don't take my word for it.''- understanding Chinese speaking practices. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1998, 22(2):163-186.

共引文献1850

同被引文献31

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部