摘要
《企业所得税法》第58条试图全面解决税收协定在国内适用的三个问题,即条约的国内法效力、适用方式和法律位阶。对于如何理解第58条中的"不同规定"与"办理",存在"绝对主权说"和"国际条约说"之争。虽然两种学说的理论依据和具体主张有所不同,但它们均以维护法律体系的纯粹性为最高目标。这两种学说并不符合中国的混合一元条约适用体制。当前,中国应采取更具实质主义导向的方法适用税收协定。
Article 58 of the Enterprise Income Tax Law aims to solve three issues in domestic application of taxation treaties,namely,the validity of treaties by domestic laws,their application model and hierarchy of law. With regard to how to understand provisions on ＂different stipulations＂and ＂handle＂of Article 58,disputes arise from two theories of the ＂doctrine of absolute sovereignty＂and the ＂doctrine of international treaty＂. Though differing in the theoretic foundations and detailed proposals,these two doctrines converge on preserving purification of legal system as their ultimate priority. However,these theories do not comply with China＇s hybrid monism regime in application of treaties. Therefore,it is suggested to adopt a more substantive- oriented method in application of taxation treaties.
出处
《北方法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第6期150-157,共8页
Northern Legal Science
关键词
税收协定
企业所得税法
绝对主权说
国际条约说
taxation treaty
the Enterprise Income Tax Law
doctrine of absolute sovereignty
doctrine of international treaty
