期刊文献+

分析泮托拉唑钠与奥美拉唑治疗消化性溃疡的疗效及安全性 被引量:4

Efficacy and Safety of Pantoprazole Sodium and Omeprazole in the Treatment Peptic Ulcer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨泮托拉唑钠与奥美拉唑治疗消化性溃疡的疗效及安全性。方法选取我院收治的100例消化道溃疡患者,将其随机分为研究组与对照组,各50例。对照组采用奥美拉唑进行治疗,而研究组采用泮托拉唑钠进行治疗。结果研究组与对照组的总有效率分别为94.0%(47/50),84.0%(42/50),两组总有效率比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组与对照组不良反应发生率分别为8.0%、26.0%,两组的不良反应比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论用泮托拉唑钠治疗消化道溃疡患者的临床疗效满意,且并发症少。 Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of pantoprazole sodium and omeprazole for the treatment of patients with peptic ulcer. Methods Selected 100 cases of peptic ulcer patients of our hospital were randomly divided into research group and the control group,50 cases each. The control group treated with omeprazole,and the research group treated with pantoprazole sodium. Results The total effective rate of research group and the control group were respectively 94.0%(47/50),84.0%(42/50),which had significant difference(P〈0.05). Research group and control group in incidence of adverse reactions were respectively 8.0%,26.0%,which the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion In patients with peptic ulcer by pantoprazole sodium,clinical curative effect was significantly,and has fewer complications.
作者 雷吉娜
出处 《中国卫生标准管理》 2016年第20期124-125,共2页 China Health Standard Management
关键词 泮托拉唑钠 奥美拉唑 消化性溃疡 疗效 Pantoprazole sodium Omeprazole Peptic ulcer Curative effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献64

  • 1罗小平.奥美拉唑与泮托拉唑治疗消化性溃疡性伴出血的疗效比较[J].西藏医药,2011,32(2):23-24. 被引量:9
  • 2李兆申.重视急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的规范化诊治[J].中华内科杂志,2005,40(1):3-4. 被引量:81
  • 3嵇国平.泮托拉唑预防应激性溃疡出血疗效观察[J].实用药物与临床,2006,9(2):104-104. 被引量:11
  • 4刁萍萍,杜奕奇,李兆申.NSAIDs与消化性溃疡出血的研究进展[J].实用临床医学(江西),2007,8(7):135-136. 被引量:16
  • 5Haman A, Weil J, Broom C, et al. Effect of oral pantoprazole on the 24-hour intragastric acidity and plasma gastrin profile [ J ]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 1992, 6 (3) : 373-380.
  • 6Judmaier G, Koelz HR. Comparison of pantoprazole and ranitidine in the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer [ J ]. Aliment Pharnmcol Ther, 1994, 8(1): 81-86.
  • 7Kromer W. Similarities and differences in the properties of substi- tuted benzimidazole: a comparison between pantoprazole and relat- ed compounds[J]. Digestion, 1995, 56(6): 443-454.
  • 8Huber R, kohil B, Sachs G,. Review article: the continuing de- velopment of proton pump inhibitors with particulm" reference to pantoprazole[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 1995, 9(4) : 363-378.
  • 9Zech K, Steinijans VW, Huber R, et al. Pharmacokinetics and drug interactions-relavant factors for the choice of a drug[J]. Int JClin Pharmacol Ther, 1996, 34(1 suppl) : S3-S6.
  • 10Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [ M/OL ]. ( updated March 2011 ) [ 2014-11-20 ]. http://www, researchgate, net/publicatioI~ 259999142_Cochrane_ Handbook_for_Systematic_Reviews of In- terventions_-Version_5.1.0_updated_March_2011.

共引文献170

同被引文献22

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部