摘要
目的对不同手术径路治疗贲门癌的效果进行对比研究。方法将我院2010年1月~2012年6月收治的72例贲门癌患者随机分为观察组与对照组,观察组36例患者行经腹径路,对照组36例患者行经胸径路,对比两组患者的手术效果。结果观察组患者淋巴结清扫个数多于对照组,术后恢复时间短于对照组（P〈0.05）。观察组患者术后并发症发生率为13.89%,低于对照组的38.89%（P〈0.05）。结论在贲门癌手术过程中行经腹径路能够有效提高手术效果,降低并发症的发生率。
ObjectiveTo study the clincal effect to different paths in the treatment of cardia cancer surgery.Methods 72 cases of patients with cardia cancer in our hospital from January 2010 to June 2012 were randomly divided into experimental group and control group,36 cases in experimental group were carried out surgery through the abdomen path,36 cases in control group were carried out surgery through the breast path, clincal effects of the two groups were compared.Results The cleaning lymph node of experimental group were more than that of control group,the recovery period was shorter than that of control group（P〈0.05）. The complication rate of experimental group was 13.89%,which was much lower than that of control group which was 38.89%（P〈0.05）.Conclusion Adopting surgery through the abdomen path in treating patients with cardia cancer can increase clinical effect, reduce the complication rate.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2016年第21期78-79,共2页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
贲门癌
经胸径路
经腹径路
Cardia cancer
Abdomen path
Breast path
