期刊文献+

专利实质审查周期的影响因素 被引量:5

Factors Analysis on Period of Patent Substantive Examination
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文从专利申请自身特征的视角出发,分析影响专利实质审查周期的微观因素。随机选取2001—2010年在中、美、日三国申请并获得授权的专利族为样本,构建两水平模型分析技术领域、申请人特征、专利文献特征与专利实质审查周期之间的关联。结果表明:专利实质审查周期不仅与技术领域关系密切,而且与申请人的国籍、权利要求数、引用数量、申请途径显著相关。研究成果一方面对政府在完善专利申请制度、健全审查员培训制度以提高实质审查效率方面具有借鉴意义,另一方面对专利申请人如何缩短实质审查周期、获得更快的专利授权具有指导意义。 The paper analyzed the micro factors which affect the period of patent substantive examination from the features of the patent application itself. It selected patent family randomly which applied in China, the United States and Japan from 2001 to 2010 as the sample. It constructed two-level model to analyze the correlation between the technical field, the characteristics of applicants, the features of patent document and the period of patent substantive examination. The results show that patent substantive examination period related closely not only with the technical field, but also with the applicant's nationality, the number of claims, the number of references, the type of applications. The research results can provide a reference for improving the system of patent applications, using patent examination of policy tools reasonably, and sounding examiner training system to improve the efficiency of the substantive examination. On the other hand, the results can provide guidance on how to be authorized faster.
出处 《中国科技论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第12期90-97,共8页 Forum on Science and Technology in China
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目"基于审查时滞控制的专利授权机制优化研究"(G030704) 同济大学中央高校基本科研业务费资助"基于申请行为控制的专利审查积压缓解机制研究"
关键词 实审周期 申请人特征 专利文献特征 两水平模型 Period of substantive examination Characteristics of applicants Features of patent document Two-level model
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献40

  • 1Jaffe A B, Lerner J. Innovation and Its Discontents [ M ]. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2004.56.
  • 2Burke P F, Reitzig M. Measuring patent assessmentquality: analyzing the degree and kind of (In) consis- tency in patent offices" decision making [ J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36(9) : 1404 - 1430.
  • 3Combeau J. Patent Quality [ EB/OL]. Available at www. ficpi, org/library/07 AmsterdamColloqu/5 - Combeau_revised. pdf. 2011 - 06 - 21.
  • 4Paul H J, Alfons, P, Elizabeth W. Misclassification in patent offices [ J]. Intellectual Property Research Insti- tute of Australia Working Paper, 2008, No. 02/08.
  • 5Lemley M A. Rational ignorance at the patent Office [J]. Northeastern University Law Review, 2001, 95 (4) :1495 - 1523.
  • 6Palangkaraya A, Jensen P H,Webster E. Determinants of international patent examination outcomes [ R ]. Intel- lectual Property Research Institute of Australia Working Paper, 2005, No. 09/05.
  • 7Quillen Jr, C D,Webster O H. Continuing patent appli- cations and performance of the U.S. patent office [ J ]. The Federal Circuit Bar Journal, 2001, 11 ( 1 ) : 1 - 21.
  • 8Jensen P H,Webster E M. Factors affecting the power of patent rights [ R]. Melbourne: Intellectual Property Re- search Institute of Australia (IPRIA) , Working Paper, 2004, No. 31/04.
  • 9Gallini N T. The economics of patents: lessons from re- cent U. S. Patent Reform [ J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2002, 16 ( 2 ) : 131 - 154.
  • 10Gaetan R, Bruno P. On the price elasticity of demand for patents [ J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statis- tics, 2011, 4 May.

共引文献40

同被引文献50

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部