摘要
利用CGSS2010调查数据,以投票为制度性政治参与的操作化定义,比较不同类型流动人口的政治参与情况,讨论户籍制度隔离作用的普遍性与差异性;利用连续变量和分类变量两种不同的操作化定义,讨论教育在政治参与中的作用。在文献综述的基础上,提出流动人口政治参与问题的研究应注意综合整体性、差异性及异质性三种视角。分析结果表明,户籍制度的隔离作用普遍存在,但这种隔离作用具有差异性,因此,户籍制度并不是导致隔离的唯一原因;教育在政治参与中的非线性、阶段性作用,可以扩展适用于其他社会现象的研究。同时,受教育程度与党员身份等因素对流动人口与户籍人口的相同作用表明整体性视角在流动人口研究中的必要性。
Based on conception definition and literature review, the paper states that studies on the political participation of floating population should pay attention to the wholeness, difference, and heterogeneity. Using data CGSS2010, the author compares different people' s political participation and discusses the universality and differentiation of the isolation of household registration system. By definition of continuous variable and classified variable, the paper discusses the function of education on political participation. The result shows that the isolating function of household registration system is universal and diverse, therefore, the household registration system is not the only factor that causes the isolation.The nonlinear and periodic function of education on political participation can be applied in other extending researches. Education and Party membership have the same function on floating and registered population, which proves the necessity of the comprehensive perspective in the research of floating population.
出处
《人口与社会》
2016年第4期21-35,共15页
Population and Society
基金
北京市哲学社会科学规划项目"北京市流动人口的社会融合研究"(13SHA001)
关键词
流动人口
政治参与
户籍制度
教育
选举权
社会公平
floating population
political participation
household registration system
education
right to vote
social equality