期刊文献+

某车型后端低速碰撞的安全性能分析及优化 被引量:2

Simulation and Performance Optimization of a Car Under Low-speed Rear End Impacts
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据GB 17354—1998法规要求对某车型进行了低速后碰撞的仿真分析,结果不满足法规要求。针对分析结果提出了一种改进方案,经过分析,采用新方案的车型满足法规性能要求。但基于经验的设计方案并不能代表最优解,以影响后端碰撞性能的关键组件材料厚度为设计变量,质量为目标函数,建立了二阶响应面近似模型,并选用自适应响应面法(Adaptive Response Surface Method,ARSM)进行优化,优化后质量减轻了22.7%,并且满足法规要求。 A FE model of a car under low-speed rear end impacts was established according to the regulation of GB17354--1998, and it was found that the protective performance of the rear bumper did not meet the requirements. An improved rear bumper design based on experience was proposed which satisfies the requirements of the regulation; however, it may not be the best solution. To further optimize the improved structure, an adaptive response surface method was adopted in which the material thicknesses of key components were designated as design variables, the weight of the components as an objective function and the second order response surface approximation model was established. The result indicates that the optimized solution meets the requirements of the regulation and the weight of the bumper system is reduced by 22,7%.
出处 《汽车工程学报》 2016年第6期442-448,共7页 Chinese Journal of Automotive Engineering
基金 重庆市重点产业共性关键技术创新专项项目(CSTC2015ZDCY-ZTZX60010)
关键词 低速碰撞 防撞横梁 自适应响应面法 轻量化 low-speed crash bumper beam adaptive response surface method light weight
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献22

  • 1廖兴涛,张维刚,李青,钟志华.响应表面法在薄壁构件耐撞性优化设计中的应用研究[J].工程设计学报,2006,13(5):298-302. 被引量:20
  • 2侯淑娟,李青,龙述尧.端部方锥形薄壁构件的抗撞性尺寸优化[J].机械强度,2007,29(4):682-685. 被引量:12
  • 3Ghasemnejad H,Hadavinia H,Simpson G.Crashworthiness Optimization of Crash Box in Automotive Structure[J].Key Engineering Materials,2007,348-349.
  • 4Wang H,Müllersch(o)n H,Mehrens T.Shape Optimization of a Crashbox Using HyperMorph and LS-OPT[C].Proc.4th German LS-DYNA Forum,Bamberg,2005.
  • 5Li Qingfen,Liu Yanjie,Wang Haidou,et al.Finite Element Analysis and Shape Optimization of Automotive Crash-Box Subjected to Low Velocity Impact[C].International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation,2009.
  • 6Schumacher A,Seibel M,Zimmer H,et al.New Optimization Strategies for the Crash Design[C].Proc.4th German LS-DYNA Forum,Bamberg,2005.
  • 7Gonda H,Neddermeijer,et al.A Framework for Response Surface Methodology for Simulation Optimization[C].Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference,USA,2000.
  • 8Fang H,Rais-Rohani M,Liu Z,et al.Comparative Study of Metamodeling Methods for Multiobjective Crashworthiness Optimization[J].Computers & Structures,2005,83(25).
  • 9Jin Ruichen,Chen Wei,Sudjianto Agus.An Efficient Algorithm for Constructing Optimal Design of Computer Experiments[J].Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference,2005,34(1).
  • 10Redhe M,Nilsson L.Optimization of the New Saab 9-3 Exposed to Impact Load Using a Space Mapping Technique[J].Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization,2004,27(5).

共引文献53

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部