期刊文献+

服役期内土体液化失效概率分析 被引量:1

Soil liquefaction probability analysis during agiven exposure time
全文增补中
导出
摘要 利用2015年美国建筑抗震规范中的衰减模型,结合美国地质勘查局提供的地震灾害地图,利用全概率定理,提出了土体服役期内液化概率的计算方法.算例分析表明,地震参数对土体液化概率具有显著的影响.提出的方法可以合理地考虑服役期内各种可能出现的地震对土体液化评价的影响. This paper presents a method to predict the liquefaction probability in a given exposure sing the attenuation models in the 2015 Nation Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program Provision as the hazard curves derived from the U. S. Geological Survey seismic hazard maps. The results sh the ground motion parameters have great impact on the liquefaction potential evaluation. The meth time u- as well ow that od sug- gested can readily take the uncertainties in the earthquake into consideration during the soil liquefaction po- tential evaluation process.
出处 《武汉大学学报(工学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第6期899-904,共6页 Engineering Journal of Wuhan University
基金 上海市青年科技启明星计划资助项目(编号:15QA1403800)
关键词 地震 液化 概率分析 静力触探试验 安全系数 earthquake liquefaction probabilistic analysis cone penetration test factor of safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献85

  • 1高孟潭,卢寿德.关于下一代地震区划图编制原则与关键技术的初步探讨[J].震灾防御技术,2006,1(1):1-6. 被引量:46
  • 2Algermissen S.T.and Perkins D.M.,1976.A probabilistic estimate of the maximum acceleration in rock in the contiguous United States:U.S.Geological Survey Open-File Report 76-416,45p.,2 pls.,scale 1:7,500,000.
  • 3Algermissen S.T.,Perkins D.M.,Thenhaus P.C.,Hanson S.L.and Bender B.L.,1990.Probabilistic earthquake acceleration and velocity maps for the United States and Puerto Rico:U.S.Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-2120,2 sheets,scale 1:7,500,000.
  • 4Ellsworth W.,2003.Appendix D-Magnitude and area data for strike slip earthquakes,in Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities,Earthquake probabilities in the San Francisco Bay region-2002-2031:U.S.Geological Survey Open-File Report 03-214,6p.
  • 5Frankel A.D.,1995.Mapping seismic hazard in the Central and Eastern United States.Seismological Research Letters,66:8-21.
  • 6Frankei A.D.,Mueller C.,Barnhard T.,Perkins D.,Leyendecker E.,Dickman N.,Hanson S.and Hopper M.,1996.National Seismic Hazard Maps-Documentation June 1996:U.S.Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-532,110 p.
  • 7Frankel A.D.,Petersen M.D.,Mueller C.S.,Hailer K.M.,Wheeler R.L.,Leyendecker E.V.,Wesson R.L.,Harmsen S.C.,Cramer C.H.,Perkins D.M.and Rukstales K.S.,2002.Documentation for the 2002 update of the National Seismic Hazard Maps:U.S.Geological Survey Open-File Report 2002-420,39 p.
  • 8Hanks T.C.and Bakun W.H.,2002.A bilinear source-scaling model for M-logA observations of continental earthquakes.Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,92:1841-1846.
  • 9Petersen M.D.,Bryant W.A.,Cramer C.H.,Cao T.,Reichle M.S.,Frankel A.D.,Lienkaemper J.J.,McCrory P.A.and Schwartz D.P.,1996.Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the State of California:California Division of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 96-08,U.S.Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-706.
  • 10Petersen M.D.,Cramer C.H.,Reichle M.S.,Frankel A.D.and Hanks T.C.,2008.Discrepancy between earthquake rates implied by historic earthquakes and a consensus geologic source model for California.Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,90:1117-1132.

共引文献73

同被引文献26

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部