期刊文献+

能源互联网中基于区块链的电力交易和阻塞管理方法 被引量:152

Electricity Transactions and Congestion Management Based on Blockchain in Energy Internet
下载PDF
导出
摘要 能源互联网是当前学术界关注的新热点。在能源互联网的环境下,大量产消者的接入将会产生新的商业模式,形成电力的直接双边交易。对于双边交易的管理,有中心化机构管理和去中心化管理两种解决方案。如果建立一个中心化机构对交易信息进行管理,存在运行成本高、信息安全性差、用户隐私难以保障等问题。而在缺乏中心化机构管理的情境下,电力市场交易主体之间存在信任问题。区块链技术是一个分布式的存储技术,数据保存在网络中的每个节点中,由所有节点共同维护,难以篡改,能够有效地解决交易双方间的信任问题。为此,提出了弱中心化管理电力交易的方法,即利用区块链技术以智能合约的形式存储电力交易信息并自动执行资金转移,记录智能电表采集的电能数据,中心机构仅对达成的交易进行安全校核和阻塞管理。比较总结了2种阻塞管理方法,改进了现有文献中分布式安全校核的算法,提高了算法收敛的稳定性。最后,利用一个6节点算例验证了所提方法的可行性。 Energy internet has become a hotspot attracting academia's close attention. Under this circumstance, participation of prosumers will result in a new business mode and electricity will be traded between these prosumers directly. These transactions can be managed either by an established central operator or by market participants autonomously. Establishing a central operator will lead to a lot of problems, including high cost, low information security and personal privacy leakage. However, trust problem is hard to solve in autonomous management of transactions between market participants. Blockchain is a distributed storage technology where data is stored and managed in every node in the network and is difficult to tamper. Therefore, it can deal with trust problem. This paper proposes a method of managing electricity transactions based on blockchain. Transactions are stored on blockchain in form of smart contracts and money is transferred automatically. Electric data collected by smart meters is also stored on blockchain. An independent central operator only deals with congestion management problem. The paper also improves convergence stability in distributed security checking method. A case consisting of six nodes is presented to prove feasibility of the method.
出处 《电网技术》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第12期3630-3638,共9页 Power System Technology
关键词 电力双边交易 阻塞管理 区块链 能源互联网 bilateral electricity transaction congestion management blockchain energy internet
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献80

  • 1[1]Electric Power Research Institute. Dispersed System Impacts: Survey and Requirement Study, Final Report. Technical Report TR-103337, 1993
  • 2[2]Wu F F, Varaiya P. Coordinated Multilateral Trades for Electric Power Networks: Theory and Implementation. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 1999, 21(2): 75~102
  • 3[3]Schweppe F C, Caramanis M C, Tabors R D, et al. Spot Pricing of Electricity. Dordrecht (Netherlands): Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988
  • 4[4]Hogan W. Contract Networks for Electric Power Transmission. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 1992, 4(9): 211~242
  • 5[5]Oren S, Spiller P, Varaiya P, et al. Nodal Prices and Transmission Rights: A Critical Appraisal. In: Working Paper of the Program on Workable Energy Regulation. Berkeley: 1996
  • 6[6]Chao Hung-po, Stephen C P. A Market Mechanism for Electric Power Transmission. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 1996, 8(7): 25~29
  • 7[7]Chao Hung-po, Stephen C P, Shmuel Oren, et al. Flow-based Transmission Rights and Congestion Management. Electricity Journal, 2000, 13(8)
  • 8[8]Hillier F S, Lieberman G J. Introduction to Operations Research. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, 1990
  • 9[9]Hogan W W. Transmission Right and Wrong. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University, 2000
  • 10[10]Alsac O, Stott B. Optimal Load Flow with Steady-state Security. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1974, 93(3): 745~751

共引文献511

同被引文献1260

引证文献152

二级引证文献1690

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部