期刊文献+

不同SCED参数下自复位耗能摇摆柱的滞回性能分析 被引量:1

Cyclic Behavior Analysis of Self-centering Energy Dissipative Rocking Column with Different Parameters of SCED
原文传递
导出
摘要 自复位耗能摇摆柱由摇摆柱、四根小型自复位耗能支撑(SCED)和预埋连接件构成。SCED对自复位耗能摇摆柱的耗能性能有重要作用,因此,研究SCED的不同参数是有必要的。利用Open Sees软件建立自复位耗能摇摆柱的有限元模型并进行了不同SCED参数下的滞回性能分析。分析表明:在几个关键参数进行一定幅度的调整时,自复位耗能摇摆柱仍具有良好的自复位性能;SCED的第一刚度对自复位耗能摇摆柱的抗侧承载力和耗能性能影响较小;随着第二刚度、摩擦力及初始预应力的增大,其承载力和耗能能力也增大。 The self-centering energy dissipative rocking column is composed of the rocking column, four small self-centering energy dissipative braces (SCED) and the embedded part. SCED plays an important role in the energy dissipation performance of self-centering energy dissipative rocking column. Therefore, it is necessary to study the different parameters of SCED. The self-centering energy dissipative rocking column is established based on OpenSees, and the quasi-static cyclic behavior with different parameters of SCED is analyzed. Numerical result shows that: self-centering energy dissipative rocking column has good self-centering properties in several key parameters of SCED; the first stiffness of SCED has little effect on the lateral bearing capacity and energy dissipation of the self-centering energy dissipative rocking column; with the increase of second stiffness, friction force and initial stress of SCED, the bearing capacity and energy dissipation capacity are also increased.
出处 《建筑科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第11期29-33,共5页 Building Science
基金 甘肃省建设厅科技攻关项目"可自复位耗能摇摆结构的抗震性能研究"(JK2012-43)
关键词 摇摆柱 自复位 耗能 自复位耗能支撑(SCED) rocking column self-centering structure energy dissipation SCED
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献38

  • 1FEMA 273 NEHRP guidelines and commentary for seismic rehabilitation of buildings [ S ]. Washington DC, USA: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1997.
  • 2FEMA 356 Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings[ S]. Washington DC, USA: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000.
  • 3FEMA 445 Next-generation performance-based seismic design guidelines: program plan for new and existing buildings [ S]. Washington DC, USA : Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2007.
  • 4Report of the seventh joint planning meeting of NEES/ E-defense collaborative research on earthquake engineering[ R]. PEER 2010/109. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, 2010.
  • 5Roh H. Seismic behavior of structures using rocking columns and viscous dampers [ D ]. Buffalo : University at Buffalo, The State University of New York. Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, 2007.
  • 6Housner G W. The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes [ J ]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1963, 53 (2) : 403- 417.
  • 7Hukelbridge A A, Clough R W. Preliminary experimental study of seismic uplift of a steel frame [ R ]. Report No. UCB/EERC-77/22. Berkely: University of California, Berkely, 1977.
  • 8Hukelbridge A A. Earthquake simulation tests of a nine story steel frame with columns allowed to uplift [ R ]. Report No. UCB/EERC-77/23. Berkely: University of California, Berkely, 1977.
  • 9Priestley M J N, Evison R J, Carr A J. Seismic response of structures free to rock on their foundations [ J ]. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 1978, 11 (3) : 141-150.
  • 10Makris N, Konstantinidis D. The rocking spectrum and the shortcomings of design guidelines [ R ]. Report No. PEER-01/07. Bekeley : University of California, Berkeley. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, 2001.

共引文献218

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部