2Goodman, K. S. Psycholinguistic universals in the read- ing process[C]// Pimsleur, P. ~ Ouinn, T. (Eds.), The Psycholinguistic of second language learning. Cam- bridge:Cambridge University Press, 1971: 135-142.
3OECD. PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Frame- work: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy[R]. OECD Publishing, 2013.
4Searborough, H. Connecting Early Language and Liter- acy to Later Reading Disabilities: Evidence, Theory, and Praetice[C]// Neuman, S. ~ Dickinson, D. (Eds.) . Handbook of Early Literacy Research. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2001: 97-110.
5MeKenna, M. C. ~ Stahl, K. Assessment for reading instruction[M]. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2009: 23.
6Anderson, L. W. ~ Krathwohl, D. R. N- Bloom, B. S. A Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives [M]. New York.. Longman, 2001.
7祝新华.阅读认知能力层次——测试题型系统的进一步发展[J].华文学刊,2005(2):1—22.
8Gagn6, R. M. The conditions of learning[M]. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston,1977.
9Mayer, R. E. Rote versus meaningful learning [J].Theory into Practice, 2002(4) : 226-232.
10Mullis, I. V. S. , Martin, M. O. , Foy, P. ~ Drucker, K.T. PIRLS 2011 International Results in Reading [R]. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS g> PIRLS Interna- tional Study Center, Boston College, 2012.
