期刊文献+

基于数据差异化分支签名的条件跳转错误检测算法

ERROR CONDITION JUMP DETECTION ALGORITHM BASED ON BRANCH SIGNATURE WITH DATA DIVERSITY
下载PDF
导出
摘要 程序控制错误可能会导致严重的程序执行错误。在安全苛求系统中,由于在恶劣环境中,处理器易受到电磁干扰等影响,可能导致处理器运算错误,存在安全隐患。目前对程序控制错误检测的研究主要基于基本块-签名和编码两种方法,基于基本块-签名的方法对程序性能影响较小,能检测程序控制错误,但检测分支跳转错误的漏检率较高;基于编码的算法能检测程序控制错误,但性能下降较大。为达到性能和漏检率的折中,本文基于基本块-签名和数据差异化编码思想,提出了分支签名的方法,从而保证分支跳转的正确性。本文采用故障注入及性能测试实验验证算法的漏检率和性能,结果表明:本算法漏检率可达,程序性能平均下降了10.2倍,相较于ANBD编码分支检测算法性能提高9.3倍。 The control-flow error may cause serious program execution errors. In safety-critical systems, the processor is susceptible to electromagnetic interference when it’s in harsh environment, which may cause the processor to operate improperly. Currently, the research is mainly focus on two ways: basic block-signature and encoding. The way based on basic block-signature which can detect control-flow error needs low performance overhead, but it has higher soft-error rate when applies to detect the error of branch jump. The way based on encoding has a good effect on detecting control-flow error, but it sacrifices more performance of software than basic block-signature. In order to compromise on performance and soft-error rate, this paper proposes branch signature which combines basic block-signature with data diversity to ensure branch to jump correctly. In this paper, we verify soft-error rate and performance by using fault injection and performance experiment. The result shows that the soft-error rate of this algorithm is with performance slowdown of 10.2 times, but it’s better than ANBD with 9.3 times.
出处 《信息技术与信息化》 2016年第11期68-75,共8页 Information Technology and Informatization
基金 "十二五"国家科技支撑计划项目(2015BAG13B01)
关键词 分支签名 数据差异化 错误检测 基本块 控制流 branch signature data diversity error detection basic block control flow
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献11

  • 1XIONG L, TAN Q. A dynamic approach to tolerate soft errors [ J]. Cluster Computing, 2013, 16(3) : 359 - 366.
  • 2FORIN P. Vital coded microprocessor principles and application for various transit systems [ C]// Proceedings of the IFAC-CCCT. Am-sterdam: Elsevier, 1989:79 -84.
  • 3SCHIFFEL U. Hardware error detection using AN-Codes [ D]. Dresden: Dresden University of Technology, 2011 : 26 - 90.
  • 4FETZER C, SCHIFFEL U, S0/]KRAUT M. AN-encoding compil- Building safety-critical systems with commodity hardware [ C] // Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Com- puter Safety, Reliability, and Security, LNCS 5775. Berlin: Springer, 2009:283-296.
  • 5OH N, SHIRVANI P P, MCCLUSKEY E J. Control-flow checking by software signatures [ J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2002, 51(1): 111-122.
  • 6TAN L, TAN Y, XU J. CFEDR: control-flow error detection and re- covery using encoded signatures monitoring [ C]// Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI and Nanotechnology Systems. Piscataway: IEEE, 2013:25 - 32.
  • 7BELL R, BENNETY P A. IEC-61508. Functional safety of electri- cal/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems [ J]. Computing & Control Engineering Journal, 2000, 11 (1) : 3 - 5.
  • 8NICOLESCU B, SAVARIA Y, VELAZCO R. Software detection mechanisms providing full coverage against single bit-flip faults [ J]. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 2004, 51 (6): 3510 - 3518.
  • 9LESK M E, SCHMIDT E. Lex: a lexical analyzer generator [ J]. Bell Laboratories, 1975, 70(5): 375-388.
  • 10JOHNSON S C. Yacc: yet another compiler-compiler [ J]. Compil- er Computing Science, 1975, 2:353 -387.

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部