摘要
把我国刑法第9条规定的刑事管辖权仅仅看成普遍管辖权,这是刑法学界的主流观点。然而,这种看法不符合我国缔结或者参加的国际条约有多种管辖权的规定,也不符合我国刑法第9条规定的原意,同时不能完全体现我国缔结或者参加国际条约的目的。应把刑法第9条规定的刑事管辖权解读为:与国内保护管辖权相对应的国际保护管辖权。这一新解读具有重要意义:可以拓宽与世界各国合作打击国际犯罪的立法和司法空间;建构刑事管辖权"二元论",更好地遵守"条约必须信守"原则;有利于对我国刑法第9条规定的刑事管辖权作全面理解。
In the circles of criminal law, it is mainstream view that the criminal jurisdiction regulated in the article 9 in the criminal law of PRC is considered as universal jurisdiction. The view does not conform to the provisions of various jurisdictions regulated in the international treaties that China has concluded or acceded to, does not conform to the article 9 in the criminal law of PRC, and can not fully reflect the purpose of China^ participation in international treaties . The criminal jurisdiction regulated in article 9 in the criminal law of PRC should be interpreted as the Jurisdiction of International Protection which is relative to domestic jurisdiction. This new interpretation will be of great significance in broadening legislation and judicial space of cooperation with other countries to combat international crime,constructing the “dualism” of criminal jurisdiction,comprehensive understanding the criminal jurisdiction regulated in the article 9 in the criminal law of PRC.
出处
《时代法学》
2016年第6期50-56,共7页
Presentday Law Science
基金
教育部人文社科研究规划基金项目"海洋发展战略背景下我国海上犯罪体系问题研究"(批准号:14YJA820029)阶段性成果
关键词
刑事管辖权
普遍管辖权
国内保护管辖权
国际保护管辖权
criminal jurisdiction
universal jurisdiction
jurisdiction of domestic protection
Jurisdiction of International Protection