期刊文献+

整合多维不确定投入产出关系的效率评价新方法 被引量:1

New efficiency evaluation method for integrated multi-dimensional uncertain relationship between inputs and outputs
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为还原多维不确定投入产出关系在效率评价理念、理论与评价方法方面存在的创新需求,从评价目标导向、评价要素构成和要素关联不确定三个维度,刻画一般效率评价情景中的要素间不确定关联呈现特征。在此基础上,针对现有方法在提取投入产出指标多维关联、刻画多类型效率涌现路径、促成多元效率内涵横向比较等方面存在的不足,创新性融合ANP方法与DEA方法构建了能够应对复杂情景下多维效率内涵提取、转换与融合需求的新方法。案例应用结果表明,以上所提出的理论及方法有效、可行,对延伸及拓展DEA方法的相对权比较理念实现复杂投入产出关联的跨层次比较,具有一定借鉴价值。 In order to restore multi-dimensional uncertain relationship between inputs and outputs about the innovation needs in the field of efficiency evaluation, theory and evaluation methods, this study describes the relationship among the elements of the general efficiency evaluation scene from the evaluation of goal orientation, evaluation elements and factors associated with the uncertainty of the three dimensions. On this basis, according to the existing methods in extracting input and output indicators, describing the multidimensional efficiency emerging path, facilitating the horizontal comparison of the connotation of multiple efficiency and other aspects of the insufficience, it innovatively fuses ANP method and DEA method to construct a new method to deal with the extraction, transformation and integration needs of multi-dimensional efficiency connotation in complex scenes. The case study indicates that the theories and methods mentioned above are effective and feasible and benefit to extend the relative rights of the DEA method of comparative philosophy, realize cross level comparison of the complex input-output correlation.
出处 《计算机工程与应用》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第23期68-74,93,共8页 Computer Engineering and Applications
基金 国家自然科学基金(No.71563024 No.71263031) 云南省哲学社会科学创新团队建设项目(No.2014cx05)
关键词 不确定性 投入产出关系 网络层次分析法-数据包络分析(ANP-DEA) 效率评价 uncertainty relationship between inputs and outputs Analytic Network Process-Data Envelopment Analysis(ANP-DEA) efficiency evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献100

  • 1岳辉,钟学燕,叶怀珍.第三方逆向物流企业的模糊评价研究[J].软科学,2005,19(5):39-42. 被引量:29
  • 2张敏,杨超,杨珺.基于AHP/DEA的物流中心选址问题研究[J].管理学报,2005,2(6):641-644. 被引量:29
  • 3Hertel G, Konradt U, Orlikowski B, Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2004, 13(1): 1-28.
  • 4Alper S, Tjosvold D, Law K S. Interdependence and Controversy in Group Decision Making: Antecedents to Effective Self-Managing Teams, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1998, 74(1): 33-52.
  • 5Janssen O, Van De Vliert E, Veenstra C. How Task and Person Conflict Shape the Role of Positive Interdependence in Management Teams. Journal of Management, 1999, 25(2): 117-142.
  • 6Van Der Vegt G, Emans B, Van De Vliert E, Team members' affective responses to patterns of intragroup interdependence and job complexity.Journal of Management, 2000, 26(4): 633-655.
  • 7Van Der Vegt G, Emans B, Van De Vliert E. Patterns of interdependence in work teams: A two-level investigation of the relations with job and team satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 2001, 54(1): 51-69.
  • 8Van Der Vegt G S, Janssen O. Joint Impact of Interdependence and Group Diversity on Innovation. Journal of Management, 2003, 29(5): 729-751.
  • 9Hirst M K. Intrinsic Motivation as Influenced by Task Interdependence and Goal Setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1988, 73(1): 96-101.
  • 10Sargent L D, Sue-Chart C. Does diversity affect group efficacy? The intervening role of cohesion and task interdependence. Small Group Research, 2001, 32(4): 426-450.

共引文献56

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部