《二十四诗品》作者之争的学术反思

The Academic Reflection of the Arguments about the Author of Twenty-four Poetic Styles

1994年开始的《二十四诗品》"作者真伪问题"的大讨论,时至今日已经二十余年。虽然论争已经尘嚣寂静,但从这二十年的辨伪论争中回首,我们可以看到它的影响并没有随着讨论的冷却而消退,反而历久弥新,并彰显出"辨伪"本身的重要意义。这场论争对《诗品》研究新局面的开创乃至之后学术风气的变化都产生了深远影响,而这一学术现象也正是当下我们需要加以研究和进行反思的。

Since 1994,the discussion of 'the twenty-four poetic styles',already has more than 20 years up to now. Although controversy has noise quiet,the reviewfrom 20 years of debate,we can see its influence not only disappear with the cooling of discussion, but newer with time,so as to highlight the significance of itself. The debate on 'the twenty-four poetic styles',is conductive to the innovation in the field of study,even has a profound influence on the academic climate change, and this academic phenomenon is what we nowneed to study and reflect.