期刊文献+

全髋关节置换与内固定治疗股骨颈骨折临床疗效分析 被引量:4

Clinical effect analysis of total hip arthroplasty and internal fixation in the treatment of fmoral neck fracture
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析全髋关节置换与内固定治疗股骨颈骨折的临床疗效。方法将100例股骨颈骨折患者分为全髋关节置换术组(50例)与内固定术组(50例),比较两组患者的临床疗效。结果全髋关节置换术组术中出血量明显少于内固定术组,且手术时间、住院时间、卧床时间及下床活动时间明显短于内固定术组(P<0.05)。全髋关节置换术组术后并发症发生率为26.00%,明显低于内固定术组的42.00%(P<0.05)。结论全髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的临床疗效及安全性优于内固定术。 Objective To analyze the clinical effect of total hip replacement and internal fixation in the treatment of femoral neck fracture. Methods One hundred cases of patients with femoral neck fracture were selected and divided into total hip replacement group (50 cases) and internal fixation group (50 cases). The clinical efficacy of two groups were compared. Results Compared with the internal fixation group, the amount of bleeding during the operation of the total hip replacement group was significantly less; and the operation time, length of stay, bed time and the time of bed movement were significantly shorter (P〈0.05). The incidence rate of adverse reaction of the total hip replacement group was 26.00%, which was significantly lower than 86.00% of the internal fixation group (P〈0.05). Conclusion The total hip arthroplasty for the femoral neck fractures patients has better clinical efficacy and is more safety than internal fixation.
作者 黄冠军
出处 《临床医学研究与实践》 2016年第25期115-116,共2页 Clinical Research and Practice
关键词 全髋关节置换 内固定 股骨颈骨折 total hip replacement internal fixation femoral neck fracture
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献37

  • 1谷长跃,张国鑫,杨树忠,高志学.全髋关节置换与双动人工股骨头置换术后远期疗效比较[J].吉林大学学报(医学版),2005,31(6):937-939. 被引量:8
  • 2王健,孙长根,胡勇,刘喜俊.全髋关节置换术与骨折内固定术治疗中老年股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2006,8(4):383-384. 被引量:15
  • 3邓仁椿,朱俊玲,洪澜,等.全髋关节置换和人工股骨头置换治疗老年股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中国医师进修杂志,2009;32(z1):81-2.
  • 4樊伟林.全髋关节置换和内固定术治疗老年股骨颈骨折患者的疗效比较[J].中国实用医刊,2008,35(22):28-29.
  • 5Lim YW,Kwon SY,HAn SKet A1 .Postoperative mortality And factors related to mortality after bipolar hemiArthrop]asty in patients with femora]neck fractures[J].J ArthroplAsty,2009,24(8):1277 -1280.
  • 6Rogmark C,Johnell O, Primary arthroplasty is better than internal fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures:a me- ta-analysis of 14 randomized studies with 2,289 patients [J]. Acta Orthop,2006,77(3) :359-367.
  • 7Sipila J, Hyv0nen P,Partanen J, et al. Early revision after hemiarthroplasty and osteosynthesis of cervical hip frac- ture:short term function mortality unchanged in 102 pa- tients[J]. Acta Orthop Seand,2094,75(4) :402 407.
  • 8Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Tornetta P 3rd, et al. Opera- rive management of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. An international survey[J]. J Bone Joint Surg, 2005,87 (9) :2122-2130.
  • 9Wazir NN, Mukundala VV, Choon DS. Early results of prosthetic hip replacement for femoral neck fracture in ac- tive elderly patients[J]. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2006,14(1):43-46.
  • 10曾国鉴.全髋关节置换术及内固定术治疗老年股骨颈骨折临床疗效的比较[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2006,27(B03):167-168. 被引量:11

共引文献147

同被引文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部