摘要
目的 观察高压氧(hyperbaric oxygen,HBO)治疗平坦型突发性聋(sudden hearing loss,SHL)的疗效.方法 对71例经HBO治疗1次/d,10 d为1个疗程的平坦型SHL患者进行回顾性分析.经常规治疗无效后采用HBO治疗44例,为对照组;在初始治疗时即采用HBO治疗27例,为HBO组.将治疗前后4个频率(500、1 000、2 000、4 000 Hz)气导纯音听阈均值(PTAs)及疗效进行比较分析.结果对照组治疗前后PTAs分别为(59.50±10.58) dB HL和(39.18±18.95) dB HL,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组治疗前后PTAs分别为(60.81±10.40)dB HL和(31.89±16.24)dB HL,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).2组治疗后总有效率分别为61.36%和81.48%,差异有统计学意义(t=8.566,P<0.05).2组患者发病至HBO开始治疗时间分别为(16.32 ±3.65)d和(9.07 ±6.85)d,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);其中对照组中>14d为53.33%(30/44),观察组中≤14 d为90.0%(20/27),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).将HBO开始治疗时间与疗效行Spearman相关性分析,治疗时间与疗效呈正相关(r=0.434,P<0.05).结论 HBO治疗应该作为综合治疗手段之一用于平坦型SHL的治疗,而且越早治疗效果越好.
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) in the treatment of flat type sudden hearing loss (SHL).Methods A retrospective analysis was made on 71 cases of flat type SHL treated with HBO.The patients were treated with HBO once a day,10 days a treatment course.Pure-tone averages (PTAs) at 4 frequencies (500,1 000,2 000,4 000 Hz) were compared before and after HBO therapy,and therapeutic efficacy was analyzed.Results Forty-four patients (the invalid group) began HBO therapy,when conventional treatment was invalid.PTAs before and after HBO therapy were respectively (59.50 ± 10.58) dB HL and (39.18 ± 18.95) dB HL,and statistical significance could be noted,when comparisons were made between them (P 〈 0.01).Twenty-seven patients (the initial group) received HBO therapy at the initial treatment stage.PTAs for the patients of this group before and after HBO therapy were respectively (60.81 ± 10.40) dB HL and (31.89 ± 16.24) dB HL,and there was statistical significance,when comparisons were made between them (P 〈 0.01).Total efficacy rates for the 2 groups after treatment were respectively 61.36% and 81.48%,and statistical significance could be seen,when comparisons were made between them(t =8.566,P 〈 0.01).The treatment time from the onset to HBO therapy for the patients of the 2 groups was (16.32 ± 3.65) days and (9.07 ± 6.85) days respectively,and statistical significance could be noticed,when comparisons were made between the 2 groups (P 〈0.01).The treatment time from the onset to HBO therapy for the invalid group was 〉 14 days,accounting for 53.33% of the patients treated(30/44),while the treatment time from the onset to HBO therapy for the initial group was ≤ 14 days,accounting for 90.0% (20/27),and statistical significance could also be noted,when comparisons were made between the 2 groups(P 〈 0.01).When correlative analyses were made between HBO initiation time and effective rate,it could be seen that HBO initiation time was positively correlated with treatment efficacy (r =0.434,P 〈 0.01).Conclusions HBO therapy could be used as one of the methods in the comprehensive treatment of flat type SHL,and the earlier HBO treatment was implemented,the better the results.
出处
《中华航海医学与高气压医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
2016年第5期386-389,共4页
Chinese Journal of Nautical Medicine and Hyperbaric Medicine
关键词
高压氧
平坦型
突发性耳聋
听力损失
Hyperbaric oxygen
Flat type
Sudden deafness
Hearing loss