摘要
航空运输业监管机构是航空运输业监管职能的承担者,航空运输业有效监管的实现取决于监管机构监管职能的认真履行。因此,对航空运输监管机构的研究意义重大。中美两国航空运输业监管机构的发展历程虽然不尽相同,但两国最终都确立航空运输业监管的大部制管理模式。通过对两国航空运输业监管机构的全面比较,不难发现两者差异相当显著。鉴于我国航空运输业"综合性"监管机构存在的不足,应当从政监分离的角度探索我国航空运输监管机构的实现路径。
Air transport regulation institution is the bearer of the air transport industry regulatory functions. Effective regulation of the implementation depends that the regulation institution conscientiously fulfills regulatory functions. Therefore, the study of air transport regulation institution is of great significance. The development process of China and the United States air transport industry regulators are not the same, but they have established the super-ministries management mode. Through a comprehensive comparison of the two countries in the air transport industry regulators, it is not difficult to find the difference significant. In view of the shortage of the air transport industry"comprehensive"regulatory, it should explore the air transport regulation institution realization path of separated from politics and regulation.
出处
《领导之友》
2016年第21期44-50,共7页
Leaders'Companion
基金
2016年度国家社科基金青年项目<航空运输市场监管法律体系改革与创新研究>(16CFX004)
关键词
航空运输
监管机构
独立性
综合性
air transport
regulation institution
independence
comprehensive