期刊文献+

碳税政策下供应链低碳技术研发策略选择 被引量:27

A Choice of Environmental R&D in Supply Chain under Carbon Tax Policy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在政府征收碳税背景下,考虑上下游企业组成的两级供应链:各企业可选择低碳技术研发竞争和研发合作,研发合作又可分为水平合作、垂直合作和全面合作;依此构建相应的博弈模型,从低碳技术研发水平、企业利润和净碳排放总量3个方面综合研究供应链低碳技术研发的策略选择。结果表明:从低碳技术研发水平和净碳排放总量看,研发合作优于研发竞争,且全面合作是各企业的最优策略选择;考虑到企业利润后,上游企业的最优策略选择是全面合作,下游企业的最优策略选择是垂直合作或水平合作。 Under the background that government levies carbon tax on carbon emission,a supply chain including two upstream firms and two downstream firms is taken for consideration,where each firm can choose competition in environmental RD or cooperation in environmental RD which can be further divided into horizontal cooperation,vertical cooperation and general cooperation.Then four game models are constructed respectively.With equilibriums of these models,environmental RD level,profit,carbon emission and social welfare are compared under each model to determine the optimal choice of environmental RD for each firm in the supply chain.It's found that,from the view of environmental RD level,carbon emission and social welfare,the strategy of cooperation in environmental RD dominants the strategy of competition in environmental RD,and general cooperation in environmental RD is an optimal strategy for each firm in supply chain.Taking profit into account,general cooperation in environmental RD is also an optimal strategy for the upstream firms,but horizontal cooperation and vertical cooperation in environmental RD maybe the optimal strategy for the downstream firms.
出处 《管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第12期1834-1841,共8页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71273114 71573057) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金资助项目(16YJC790108) 广东省自然科学基金资助项目(2015A030310199)
关键词 碳税 水平合作 垂直合作 全面合作 carbon tax policy horizontal environmental R&D cooperation vertical environmental R&D cooperation general environmental R&D cooperation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献134

  • 1穆昕,王浣尘,李雷鸣.基于差异化策略的环境管理与企业竞争力研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(3):26-31. 被引量:18
  • 2d' Aspremont C, Jaequemin A. Cooperative and noneooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers[ J]. American Economic Review ,1988,78(5) : 1133 - 1137.
  • 3Kamien M, Muller E, Zang I. Research joint ventures and R&D cartels [ J ]. American Economic Review, 1992, 82(5) : 1293 - 1306.
  • 4Spence M. Cost reduction, competition, and industry performance[ J]. Econometrica, 1984, 52 (5) : 101 - 121.
  • 5Qiu L D, Tao Z. Policy on international R&D cooperation: subsidy or tax? [ J]. European Economic Review, 1998, 42(9) : 1727 - 1750.
  • 6Romano R. Aspects of R&D subsidization [J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1989,104 (4) : 863 - 873.
  • 7Petrakis E, Poyago -Theotoky J. R&D subsidies versus R&D cooperation in a duopoly with spillovers and pollution [ J ]. Australian Economic ,2002, 41 ( 1 ) : 37 - 52.
  • 8Ulph A. Environmental policy and international trade when governments and producers act strategically [J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1996, 30:265-281.
  • 9Poyago - Theotoky J A. The organization of R&D and environmental policy[ J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2007, 62:63 -75.
  • 10滕春贤,姚锋敏,刘志勇.具有Stackelberg博弈特征的供应链定价协调[J].系统工程,2007,25(7):33-37. 被引量:6

共引文献263

同被引文献268

引证文献27

二级引证文献214

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部