摘要
尽管有大量的研究表明了针灸临床的有效性,但仍有研究显示针刺与假(安慰)针无差异,从而对针灸的特异性提出了质疑。原因可能在于针灸为复杂干预,干预实施过程中可产生独特的非特异性效应,且产生这一效应的影响因素众多,常常被忽视,因而无法有效地评估针灸的疗效。而产生针灸非特异性效应的影响因素包括医患沟通、期望效应、医师权威性、患者针灸经历等,可能与期望的生物学效应、霍桑效应和巴普洛夫条件反射等机制有关。
Even though a large amount of researches showing the clinical effectiveness of acupuncture, there are the researches indicating the absent difference between acupuncture and sham-acupuncture (placebo), which pro- vides the doubts on the specificity of acupuncture. It may be considered that acupuncture intervention is complica- ted and may produce unique non-speciflc effect, which reSultS in the failure to evaluate effectively the acupuncture efficacy. The influential factors of the non-specific effect of acupuncture include the interaction between physician and patient, expectancy, physician authority, acupuncture treatment experiences, etc. It may be also relevant with the anticipated biological effect, Hawthorne effect, Pavlovian conditioned reflex, etc.
出处
《中国针灸》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2016年第12期1319-1323,共5页
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion
基金
北京市医院管理局临床技术创新项目:XMLX201607
北京市科技计划课题首都临床特色应用研究专项:Z131107002213034
北京市自然科学基金资助项目:7154206
关键词
针灸
非特异性
特异性
影响因素
机制
综述
acupuncture
non-specific effect
specifiC effect
impact factor
mechanism
review