2013年全科医学领域慢性病健康教育相关科研文献研究

Study of academic research literatures related on chronic diseases health education in the fields of general practice in 2013

目的 了解2013年全科医学领域中慢性病健康教育相关科研文献的研究情况。方法 以中国期刊全文数据库（CNKI）和万方数据库作为文献检索库,利用文献计量学和内容分析法对2013年1－12月发表的全科医学领域中慢性病健康教育相关的科研文献进行统计分析。结果 2013年共计发表全科医学相关研究文献2596篇。其中,涉及到慢性病健康教育的文章有533篇,占总文献数的20.5%。在慢性病健康教育文献中,第一作者发表文献数量最多的机构为三级医院和军队医院,占38.6%;采用最多的研究方法是现况研究,占58.5%;采用基层医疗国际分类（ICPC）对研究主题所涉及的疾病进行分类,发现慢性病健康教育的研究集中在“内分泌、代谢和营养”“循环系统”“消化系统”等,所占比例依次为29.3%、28.3%、17.3%;刊登文献最多的前10种期刊占发表总量的40.2%,《中国全科医学》发表的文献数量所占比例最高为7.7%;31.1%的文献获得不同级别基金的支持。结论全科医学领域中慢性病健康教育的研究得到重视,但基层医疗机构相关的科研能力仍需进一步加强。

Objective To understand the research literatures related on chronic diseases health education in the fields of general practice in 2013. Methods Based on the China academic journal full-text database （CNKI） and Wanfang database, all the chronic diseases health education related scientific research literatures in 2013 were extracted and analyzed by bibliometric and content analysis. Results Among a total of 2596 general practice related literatures pub- lished in 2013, there were 533 literatures related to chronic diseases health education, accounted for 20.5%. The institutions where the first author affiliated and published most literatures were the tertiary hospitals and military hospitals, accounted for 38.6%. Most of the literatures adopted descriptive research method as their epidemiological methods, accounled for 58.5%. International classification of primary care （ICPC） was used to classify the clinical problems in the literatures, the three top research contents were ＂endocrine, metabolism and nutrient circulatory system＂ and ＂digestive system＂, accounted for 29.3%, 28.3%, and 17.3% respectively. The top ten journals where the literatures published most were accounted for 40.2% in all, and 7.7% of the literatures published in the magazine named Chinese General Prigrice. 31.1% of the literatures obtained different level of fund supported. Conclusion Health education on chronic diseases in the field of general practice has receipt attention, but the research capability of primary eareinstitutions needs to further strengthen.