摘要
"法律的生命一直不是逻辑,而是经验"这一经典名言被当作是霍姆斯"反逻辑"的法理学口号。但是,对霍姆斯文本的全面考察就会发现,他所反对的是逻辑学的一种特定形式。霍姆斯的"经验"不仅表明正统逻辑在法律裁决中并不起主要作用,而且在其中蕴藏着补充正统逻辑的"天然逻辑"或"新逻辑"的萌芽。因而,挖掘经验中的新逻辑,提取丰富的法律论证形式,甚至更一般的逻辑形式,构成发展霍姆斯论点的一种新的可能性。
The classical saying "The Life of the law has not been logic, it has been experience" has been re- garded as the Anti-logic jurisprudence slogan of Holmes. Yet an overall study of the text of Holmes makes it clear that what he opposes is a particular form of logic. The Experience in Holmes' view not only indicates that formal log- ic does not play a chief role in legal judgment, but also implies the seed of Natural Logic or New Logic which is com- plementary to formal logic. Therefore, digging up the new logic, extracting the rich forms of legal argument, even the more general logical forms in experience, make up a new possibility of developing the argument of Holmes.
出处
《政法论丛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第6期69-84,共16页
Journal of Political Science and Law
基金
国家社科基金重点项目"法律论证逻辑研究--面向‘法治中国’建设的整合性和应用性研究"(15AZX019)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
霍姆斯
逻辑
经验
天然逻辑
法律逻辑
论证形式
Holmes
logic
experience
natural logic
legal logic
argument schemes