期刊文献+

前列腺癌根治术后Gleason评分升级与术前多参数MRI PI-RADS评分的关系 被引量:7

Relationship between properative MRI PI-RADS score and Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨前列腺癌根治术后Gleason评分升级与术前多参数MRI(mpMRI)前列腺影像报告数据系统(PIRADS)评分的关系。方法 回顾性分析198例前列腺癌根治术后患者的资料。根据PI-RADS评分分为低分(1~2分),中分(3分),高分(≥4分)3组。通过单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析探讨PI-RADS评分与Gleason评分的关系。结果 单因素分析显示,前列腺特异性抗原密度、前列腺体积、术前穿刺病理Gleason评分、精囊侵犯、穿刺阳性针数、PI-RADS评分是术后Gleason评分升级的影响因子(P均〈0.05)。多因素分析显示,前列腺体积(P〈0.01)与术前PI-RADS评分(P〈0.01)是前列腺癌根治术后Gleason评分升级的独立预测因素。术前PI-RADS评分低分组及中分组术前与术后Gleason评分差异无统计学意义(P均〉0.05);而高分组术后Gleason评分高于术前,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论 术前Gleason评分较低(≤6分)而PI-RADS评分较高(≥4分)的小体积前列腺癌患者,术后Gleason评分升级的可能大。 Objective To investigate the relationship between Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy and preoperative prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score of multi-parameter MRI (mpMRI). Methods Data of 198 patients treated by radical prostatectomy were retrospectively analyzed. According to PI-RADS score, the patients were divided into 3 groups:Low score group (1-2 points), moderate score group (3 points) and high score group (≥4 points). Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were done to investigate the relationship between PI-RADS score and Gleason score. Results Univariate analysis showed that prostate-specific antigen density, prostate volume, preoperative biopsy Gleason score, seminal vesicle invasion, number of positive biopsy needle and PI-RADS score were the influencing factors of postoperative Gleason score upgrading (all P〈0.05). Multivariate analysis indicated that prostate volume (P〈0.01) and preoperative PI-RADS score (P〈0.01) were independent predictors of Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy. There was no significant difference between preoperative and postoperative Gleason scores in the low and middle PI-RADS score groups (P〉0.05). The postoperative Gleason score was significantly higher than preoperative Gleason score in high PI-RADS score group (P〈0.05). Conclusion Lower biopsy Gleason score (≤6 points), higher PI-RADS score (≥4 points), smaller prostate volumes are predictors of Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy.
出处 《中国介入影像与治疗学》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第12期737-741,共5页 Chinese Journal of Interventional Imaging and Therapy
基金 福建省科技计划重点项目(2014Y0018) 福建省卫计委医学创新科研项目(2015-CX-24)
关键词 前列腺肿瘤 磁共振成像 PI-RADS评分 GLEASON评分 Prostatic neoplasms Magnetic resonance imaging PI-RADS score Gleason score
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献53

  • 1王霄英,周良平,丁建平,李飞宇,山刚志,肖江喜,蒋学祥.RS对中国人前列腺癌鉴别诊断标准的初步研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2004,20(8):1150-1153. 被引量:97
  • 2王国民,武睿毅.我国前列腺癌实验研究的现状和展望[J].中华实验外科杂志,2005,22(9):1031-1034. 被引量:42
  • 3汪朔,谢立平,沈华锋,郑祥毅,秦杰,白宇,张晨光,陈昭典,蔡松良,张志根,任国平,王丽君,余心如.346例前列腺癌的Gleason评分分布特征及其与临床分期的关系[J].中华男科学杂志,2006,12(8):689-692. 被引量:12
  • 4谢立平,蒋建平,沈华锋,郑祥毅,秦杰,张晨光,白宇,陈昭典,蔡松良,张志根,任国平,王丽君,余心如.前列腺癌血清PSA、f/tPSA与Gleason评分、临床分期的相关性研究[J].中国男科学杂志,2007,21(3):14-17. 被引量:12
  • 5Gore JL, Shariat SF, Miles BJ, et al. Opti- mal combinations of systematic sextant and laterally directed biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer. J Urol, 2001,165(5) :1554-1559.
  • 6Jones JS, Oder M, Zippe CD. Saturation prostate biopsy with periprostatic block can be performed in office. J Urol, 2002,168 (5):2108-2110.
  • 7Jones JS, Patel A, Schoenfield L, et al. Saturation technique does not improve cancer detection as an initial prostate biopsy strategy. J Urol, 2006,175(2) :485-488.
  • 8Descazeaud A, Rubin M, Chemama S, et al. Saturation biopsy protocol enhances prediction of pT3 and surgical margin status on prostatectomy specimen. World J Urol, 2006,24(6) :676-680.
  • 9Delongchamps NB, Haas GP. Saturation biopsies for prostate cancer: Current uses and future prospects. Nat Rev Urol, 2009, 6(12) :645-652.
  • 10Patel AR, Jones JS. Optimal biopsy strategies for the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol, 2009, 19 (3): 232-237.

共引文献44

同被引文献74

引证文献7

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部