摘要
我国采用程序启动型立案模式,立案监督程序所呈现的问题更多地具有本土色彩。以某一地区刑事立案及立案监督情况为主线,结合全国近十余年的立案监督情况,使用数据和案例进行问题导向型的实证研究,有助于深入分析刑事立案监督存在的问题。面对较高发案率、有限的监督力量难以延伸至刑事受案至立案全过程导致的受案初查不受重视、立案不作为、立而不侦、降格处理等问题,可以考虑将立案监督与侦查监督、行政执法监督相结合,并在侦诉审合理化构造下加强对侦查权的控制。
The case- filing model of China is based on the initiation of a special docketing procedure. The problems presented in the procedure of docketing supervision are mostly indigenous.. This article will do the imperial research by checking a certain city's criminal cases- filing condition and the supervision over it. In face of the high rate of exposed criminal cases,the supervision from the people's procuratorate is hard to cover the whole process,resulting in problems including the overlook towards the case- accepting,the non- investigation after cases- filing,and the rank- demotion of cases. Considering the gradual reform process,we can link the supervision over cases- filing with the supervision over investigation and administrative enforcement,and discuss the control of investigation power in the rational structure.
出处
《国家检察官学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第6期62-77,共16页
Journal of National Prosecutors College
关键词
立案监督
侦查监督
行政执法
检警关系
实证研究
Supervision over Case-filing
Supervision over Investigation
Administrative Enforcement of Law
Prosecutor-police Relations
Empirical Research