仲裁程序中的释明权探析

Research on Interpretation Right in Arbitration Procedure

诉讼模式由职权主义向当事人主义的转变是司法体制改革的重要内容之一,让更多的自主权回归当事人使释明权理论再次成为人们的关注点。在辩论主义与释明权这对矛盾中,释明权作为矛盾的次要方面应从属于辩论主义。因此,释明权行使应遵循有限行使原则以避免对当事人处分权的不当干预。释明行为与格式化、程序化的普通司法职权行为不同,它具有双方联系和互动的行为结构模式,不宜将其普适化。仲裁机构的释明权应主要针对案件的实体部分行使,具体包括仲裁请求的释明、事实主张的释明、举证责任的释明和证据提供的释明。

The transformation of litigation model from inquisitorial system to adversary system is one of the important contents of the judicial system reform. To give the parties more autonomy makes the theory of interpretation right once again become the focus of attention. In the contradiction between debate doctrine and interpretation right,the latter,as a secondary aspect of contradiction,should be subordinate to the former. Therefore,the exercise of interpretation right should follow limited exercise principle so as to avoid improper intervention of the parties＇ right to dispose. The behavior of interpretation is different from those formatted and programmed general judicial authority behaviors. It has the behavior structure model of contact and interaction between the two parties and should not be universal. The interpretation right of arbitration organization should be mainly in the exercise of the substantive part of the case,including the interpretation of arbitration request,factual claim,burden of proof,and evidence providing.