摘要
在经验知识中,如何消除给予神话?通过对理由空间的不同解读,塞拉斯、麦克道威尔、布兰顿给出了不同的答案。塞拉斯把逻辑空间二分,塞拉斯得出理由空间有着内在的推论结构,是规范的。麦克道威尔拒绝塞拉斯的逻辑空间二分,认为构成理由的逻辑空间规范性可以使自然逻辑空间的概念性材料加以重构。布兰顿则在塞拉斯的逻辑空间基础之上,演化出语义推论主义。
How to eliminate the Myth of Given in empirical knowledge？ Through the different interpretation concerning the space of reason, Sellars, Mc- Dowell, and Brondom offer different answers. Sellars admits that there is inferential structures, normative in the space of reason by dividing it two. McDowell rejects it, and considers that it can re -construct concepts in space of reason. Eventually, Brandom fashions inferentialism through his interpretation of the space of reason.
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第12期9-13,共5页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
