期刊文献+

早期乳腺癌患者术前血清癌胚抗原和CA15-3水平及其与病理学特征的关系 被引量:12

Serum levels of carcino-embryonic antigen and CA15-3 in patients with early stage breast cancer ;before surgery and their correlation with pathological features
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨早期浸润性乳腺癌患者术前血清癌胚抗原(CEA)和糖类抗原CA15-3水平的变化及其与病理学参数的相关性。方法应用电化学发光免疫分析(ECLI)技术检测223例早期浸润性乳腺癌患者、109例良性病变患者及30名健康对照的血清CEA和CA15-3水平,免疫组织化学和荧光原位杂交法(FISH)检测雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、HER2等病理学指标。分析乳腺癌血清CEA、CA15-3水平与病理学参数的相关性。结果乳腺癌组患者的血清CA15-3和CEA水平分别为(22.27,15.11)U/ml、(5.03,0.49)μg/L,均高于良性病变组患者(14.13,3.04)U/ml和(2.72,0.11)μg/L,差异均有统计学意义(均P〈0.05)。组织学Ⅲ级患者的CEA水平为(6.34,0.93)μg/L,明显高于Ⅰ-Ⅱ级的(4.23,0.50)μg/L,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。T1期肿瘤CA15-3水平为(19.26,15.08)U/ml, T2期肿瘤CA15-3水平为(28.73,11.53)U/ml,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。不同的组织学类型、病理分期、淋巴结状态、ER、PR、HER2等病理特征间,血清CEA、CA15-3水平差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。乳腺癌组CEA、CA15-3阳性率分别为13.5%、26.5%,均高于良性病变组的3.7%和1.8%,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。30例健康对照组中CEA、CA15-3无一例阳性。乳腺癌组CEA和CA15-3二者联合检测敏感度均为9.4%,良性病变组敏感度为0,差异均有统计学意义(均P〈0.05)。结论患者血清中CEA和CA15-3水平变化为乳腺癌早期诊断、病理分期、预后判断和疗效监测提供有效的临床依据。 Objective To detect and analyze the levels of preoperative serum carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) and CA15-3 in early invasive breast cancer patients and their correlation with pathological parameters. Methods Electrochemical luminescence immunoassay (ECLI) technology was used to detect serum levels of CEA and CA15-3 in 223 cases of early invasive breast cancer patients, 109 patients with benign lesions, and 30 cases of heath control. Immunohistochemical (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were used to detect the estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone recepter (PR), and its HER-2 pathological indicators.Besides, the correlation of serum CA15-3, CEA levels and pathological parameters was analyzed. Results The serum CA15-3 and CEA levels of Breast cancer patients [(22.27,15.11) U/ml, (5.03± 0.49) μg/L] were significantly higher than that of patients in benign lesion group [(14.13,3.04) U/ml, (2.72, 0.11) μg/L] (P〈 0.05). CEA level of patients with histological grade Ⅲ was (6.34 ,0.93) μg/L, significantly higher than the level Ⅰ-Ⅱ (4.23,0.50) μg/L (P〈 0.05). CA15-3 level was (19.26,15.08) U/ml in T1 tumors, and CA15-3 level was (28.73 ,11.53) U/ml in T2 tumors (P〈0.05). The serum levels of CEA and CA15-3 between different histology, pathologic stage, lymph node status, ER, PR, HER-2, pathological characteristics had no significant difference (P〉0.05). CEA positive rate of breast cancer group was significantly higher than that of benign lesions(13.5%vs. 3.7%, 26.5%vs. 1.8%, P〈0.05). 30 cases of normal control group had no positive one. The joint monitoring sensitivity of CEA and CA15-3 breast cancer group was 9.4 %, the sensitivity was 0 in benign lesion group. There was significant difference (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The changes of Serum CA15-3 and CEA levels in breast cancer patients can be considered as the judgment standard for early diagnosis, pathological staging, prognosis and clinical effect monitoring.
出处 《肿瘤研究与临床》 CAS 2016年第9期600-603,共4页 Cancer Research and Clinic
基金 湖北省卫生和计划生育委员会科研重点项目(JX4A07)
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 肿瘤标志物 CA15-3 癌胚抗原 病理学 Breast neoplasms Tumor marker CA15-3 Carcino-embryonic antigen Pathology
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献68

  • 1陶冀,游廉,王锡山.乳腺癌肿瘤标志物CEA、CA15-3表达水平的临床意义[J].中国肿瘤临床,2005,32(13):751-754. 被引量:21
  • 2蒯大禹,林祥通,管一晖,刘永昌,徐莲琴,朱丽云.骨转移瘤^(99m)Tc-MDP骨显像与CT、MRI及X线检查对比观察[J].中华核医学杂志,1996,16(2):129-129. 被引量:19
  • 3杨才明,朱清峰,夏淑君,张小群.性激素与乳腺癌发生和治疗的研究进展(文献综述)[J].放射免疫学杂志,2006,19(2):142-143. 被引量:20
  • 4洪锡田,王景萍,张瑞丽.血清CA153、CA125、CEA、SF检测在乳腺癌诊断中的价值[J].中国民康医学,2007,19(1):23-24. 被引量:22
  • 5Harris L, Fritsche H, Mennel R,et al. American society of slinical oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer[ J]. J Clin Oncol,2007,25 (33) :5287 - 5312.
  • 6Molina R, Barak V.van Dalen A, et al. Tumor markers in breast cancer ruropean group on tumor markers tecommendations [ J ]. Tumour Biol, 2005, 26 ( 6 ) : 281 - 293.
  • 7Bieglmayer C, Szepesi T, Kopp B,et al. CA15-3, MCA, CAM26, CAM29 are members of a polymorphic family of mucin -like glycopro- reins [ J]. Tumour Biol,1991,12(3) :138 - 148.
  • 8Dnistrian AM, Schwartz MK, Greenberg EJ, et at. Evaluation of CA M26, CA M29, CA 15 - 3 and CEA as circulating tumor markers in breast cancer patients[ J ]. Tumour Biol, 1991 , 12 (2) : 82 - 90.
  • 9Gion M, Mione R, Leon AE , et al. CA27.29 : a valuable marker for breast cancer management. A confirmatory multicentric study on 603 cases [ J ]. Eur J Cancer,2001,37 (3) :355 - 363.
  • 10Molina R, Jo J, Filella X,et al. c - erbB - 2 oncoprotein, CEA, and CA 15 -3 in patients with breast cancer: prognostic value[ J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 1998,51 (2) : 109 - 119.

共引文献193

同被引文献95

引证文献12

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部