摘要
目的比较针灸与艾司唑仑治疗失眠症的临床疗效。方法选择我院2015年1月至2016年3月收治的失眠症患者47例为观察组,选择同期我院收治的失眠症患者42例为对照组。观察组予以针灸治疗,对照组给予口服艾司唑仑片,比较两组疗效,采用PSQI评估患者治疗前后睡眠质量。结果观察组总有效率为93.6%,对照组为81.0%,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗前,观察组PSQI总分为(15.19±3.28)分,对照组为(15.43±3.52)分,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,观察组PSQI总分为(9.26±3.34)分,对照组为(11.37±3.62)分,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论针灸治疗失眠症的疗效优于艾司唑仑,值得临床进一步研究和应用。
Objective To compare the curative effect of acupuncture and estazolam in the treatment of insomnia. Methods Forty-seven case of patients with insomnia in our hospital from January 2015 to March 2016 were chosen as the observation group, and 42 cases of patients with insomnia in our hospital during the same period were chosen as the control group. The observation group was treated with acupuncture, and the control group was treated with estazolam. The curative effect of two groups was compared, and the sleep quality of patients of the two groups before and after treatment were assessed by PSQI. Results The total effective rate of the observation group was 93.6%, the control group was 81.0%, the difference showed statistical significance (P〈0.05). Before treatment, the total score of PSQI in the observation group was (15.19±3.28) points, and the control group was (15.43±3.52) points, and the difference showed no statistical significance (P〉0.05). After treatment, the total score of PSQI in the observation group was (9.26±3.34) points, and the control group was (11.37±3.62) points, difference between two groups was not significant (P〈0.05). Conclusion The curative effect of acupuncture treatment of insomnia is better than that of estazolam, which is worthy of further clinical research and application.
出处
《临床医学研究与实践》
2016年第24期122-123,共2页
Clinical Research and Practice