摘要
刑事案例指导制度是刑事诉讼过程中的一种司法适用制度,参与机构应该包括但不限于法院。我国目前还谈不上系统建立刑事案例指导制度,刑事案例指导的制度化不仅需要政治决策层的顶层设计,还需有相应的立法确认和司法制度的支持,当前由最高人民法院主导和牵头实施的刑事指导性案例制度化是合理的。从效果上讲,虽然最高法院的公报、个案批复等为刑事指导性案例制度化提供了有益的实践,但是目前所公布的部分刑事指导性案例并没有达到期望,原因主要在于生成机制等方面存在不足。
Criminal-case-instructed proceeding system is a law application system in criminal proceedings and the agencies involved should not be limited to courts. Currently, no such Criminal-case-instructed proceedings have been systematically established domestically. Its establishment requires not only top-level designs of political policy makers, but also corresponding legislative confirmation and support from the judicial system. However, the institutionalization of instructive criminal cases initialized and launched by the Supreme Court is reasonable. In terms of efficiency, despite publication, individual case replies and other beneficial practices of the Supreme Court, part of the criminal-case-instructed proceedings currently publicized have not reached expectations due to deficiencies in aspects such as mother-mechanisms.
出处
《净月学刊》
2016年第6期117-122,共6页
Journal of Jilin Public Security Academy
基金
2015年度重庆市社科规划项目"刑事指导性案例生成机制研究--以重庆市指导性案例生成实践为样本"的阶段性成果
关键词
刑事案例指导制度
顶层设计
生成机制
criminal-case-instructed proceedings
top-level designs
mother-mechanisms