期刊文献+

间歇性内分泌治疗联合近距离放疗在局限性前列腺癌治疗中的应用 被引量:2

Application of intermittent hormonal therapy combined with brachytherapy in the treatment of patients with localized prostate cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨间歇性内分泌治疗(IHT)联合近距离放疗在局限性前列腺癌治疗中的应用价值。方法将82例局限性前列腺癌患者随机分为观察组和对照组,各41例。对照组给予IHT,观察组给予IHT联合125I粒子植入近距离放疗,比较2组治疗情况、生化无进展生存期(BPFS)、5年无事件生存率及5年总生存率。结果观察组治疗有效率为97.6%,显著高于对照组的80.5%(P<0.05)。观察组中位BPFS为33.9个月,显著长于对照组的21.2个月(P<0.05)。观察组5年无事件生存率和5年总生存率显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 IHT联合125I粒子植入近距离放疗治疗局限性前列腺癌患者的有效率优于单纯IHT,延长BPFS,且不良反应可耐受。 Objective To explore the application value of intermittent hormonal therapy( IHT) combined with brachytherapy in the treatment of patients with localized prostate cancer.Methods Eighty- two patients with localized prostate cancer were randomly divided into observation group( n = 41) and control group( n = 41). The patients in control group were treated with IHT,while those in observation group were given IHT combined with125 I seed implantation brachytherapy.Treatment conditions,biochemical progression-free survival( BPFS),5-year non-event survival rate and 5- year overall survival rate were compared between two groups. Results The response rate was97. 6% in observation group,which was significantly higher than 80. 5% in control group( P〈0. 05). The median BPFS were 33. 6 months in observation group,which was significantly longer than 21. 2 months in control group( P〈0. 05). Both 5- year non- event survival rate and 5- year overall survival rate in observation group were significantly higher than those in control group( P〈0. 01). Conclusion For patients with localized prostate cancer,IHT combined with125 I seed implantation brachytherapy is superior to IHT alone in response rate and BPFS,and adverse reactions can be tolerable.
出处 《实用临床医药杂志》 CAS 2016年第21期59-61,65,共4页 Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
关键词 前列腺癌 间歇性内分泌治疗 近距离放疗 125I粒子植入 生存率 prostate cancer intermittent hormonal therapy brachytherapy 125I seed im plantation survival rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献41

  • 1王俊杰,黄毅,冉维强,朱丽红,白静,田素青,李金娜.^(125)I粒子近距离治疗前列腺癌临床应用[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2004,24(6):509-512. 被引量:38
  • 2胡晓,李鸣.前列腺癌患者能否进行间歇内分泌治疗?[J].中华医学信息导报,2005,20(7):13-14. 被引量:2
  • 3叶定伟.前列腺癌的流行病学和中国的发病趋势[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(6):362-364. 被引量:168
  • 4Niraula S, Le LW, Tannock IF. Treatment of prostate cancer with intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation: A sys- tematic review of randomized trials. J Clin Oncol, 2013, 31 (16) : 2029-2036.
  • 5Hussain M, Tangen CM, Berry DL, et al. Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med, 2013, 368(14): 1314-1325.
  • 6Raghavan D, Koczwara B, Javle M. Evolving strategies of cyto- toxic chemotherapy for advanced prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer, 1997, 33(4): 566-574.
  • 7Labile F. Hormonal therapy of prostate cancer. Prog Brain Res, 2010, 182: 321-341.
  • 8Grossmann ME, Huang H, Tindall DJ. Androgen receptor signa- ling in androgen-refractory prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2001, 93(22) : 1687-1697.
  • 9Ahmadi H, Daneshmand S. Androgen deprivation therapy: Evi- dence-based management of side effects. BJU Int, 2013, 111 ( 4 ) : 543-548.
  • 10Klotz L, Toren P. Androgen deprivation therapy in advanced prostate cancer: Is intermittent therapy the new standard of care? Curr On- col, 2012, 19(Suppl 3) : S13-$21.

共引文献48

同被引文献32

引证文献2

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部