期刊文献+

限时写作条件下任务前构思和在线构思对二语写作语言表现的影响 被引量:9

The Effects of Pre-task Planning and On-line Planning on L2 Written Linguistic Performance in Timed Writing
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文探讨了任务前构思与在线构思两种不同的构思方式在限时写作条件下对二语写作语言表现的影响。两个二语水平层次的120名中国大学非英语专业学生参与了实验,对他们的文本进行了流利度、准确度、复杂度的统计与分析。结果发现,写作者在任务前构思的条件下写作的流利度有显著提高,准确度、句法复杂度也有提高,但幅度不显著,而词汇复杂度在在线构思的条件下有一定提高,但幅度也不显著。二语水平与不同构思方式对写作的流利度和准确度没有交互影响,对写作的复杂度有交互影响,任务前构思对二语水平高的写作者在句法复杂度和词汇复杂度方面都有促进作用,而对低水平写作者没有帮助。以上结果表明任务前构思与在线构思对二语写作语言表现有不同的作用,这对二语写作教学与测试都有一定的启示。 This article reports the results of a study on the effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on L2 written linguistic performance in timed writing. 120 Chinese university non-English majors of two different L2 proficiency levels participated in the experiment. Their written texts were coded and analyzed in terms of fluency,accuracy and complexity. Results showed that pre-task planning improved the learners' fluency significantly while a little with accuracy and syntactic complexity. On-line planning helped to improve the learners' lexical complexity,but not to a large extent. There was no interaction between planning style and L2 proficiency affecting fluency and accuracy,but the interaction could be observed in terms of both syntactic complexity and lexical complexity,which indicated that learners of high L2 proficiency benefited from pretask planning in complexity while learners of lowL2 proficiency did not. The findings indicates that pre-task planning and on-line planning have different effects on L2 written linguistic performance,which provides some implications for L2 writing teaching and testing.
出处 《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第6期66-74,共9页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
基金 2013年江苏省社会科学基金项目"任务复杂度对中国非英语专业学生二语写作表现的影响"(项目编号:13YYC015) 江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究基金项目"外语定量数据分析中的效应值研究"(项目编号:2013SJD740018)的阶段性成果
关键词 限时写作 任务前构思 在线构思 二语水平 二语写作语言表现 timed writing pre-task planning on-line planning L2 proficiency L2 written linguistic performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献92

  • 1Bereiter, C. & M. Scardamalia. The Psychology of Written Composition[M]. Hillasdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates. 1987.
  • 2Berninger, V. W. , Mizokawa, D. & R. Bragg. Theory-based diagnosis and remediation of writing disabilities[J]. Journal of School Psychology, 1991 (29): 57-79.
  • 3Berninger, V. W. Reading and Writing Acquisition: A Development Neuropsychological Perspective[M]. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1996.
  • 4Burtis, P. J. , Bereiter, C. , Scardamalia, M . & J. Tetroe. The development of planning in writing[A]. In Kroll,B. & G. Wells (eds.). Explorations in the Development of Writing[C]. New York: Wiley, 1983:153-174.
  • 5Carey, L. et al. Differences in Writers' Initial Task Presentations (Tech. Rep. No. 35)[M]. Carnegie Mellon University, 1989.
  • 6De La Paz, S. & S. Graham. Effects of dictation and advanced planning instruction on the composing of students with writing and learning problems [J]. Journal of Educational Psychology,1997(89) :203-222.
  • 7Emig, J. The Composing Process of Twelfth Graders[M]. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English, 1971.
  • 8Flower ,L. & J. Hayes. The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constrains [A]. In Gregg,L. & E. Steinberg (eds.). Cognitive Processes in Writing[C]. Hove, Sussex and Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum,1980: 31-50.
  • 9Flower, L. & J. Hayes. Problem-solving strategies and the writing process[J]. College English,1977(39) : 449-461.
  • 10Gould, J. Experiments on composing letter: Some facts, some myths and some observations[A]. In Gregg,L. & E. Steinberg (eds.). Cognitive Process in Writing[C]. Hallsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980:97-127.

共引文献72

同被引文献151

引证文献9

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部