期刊文献+

司法改革背景下检察机关案件信息公开制度的问题与对策 被引量:5

Problems of and Solutions to the System of Procuratorial Organ's Case Information Disclosure under the Context of Judicial Reform
原文传递
导出
摘要 检察机关案件信息公开制度是当前司法改革的重要组成部分。它是对原有"检务公开"的进一步深化,是建立阳光司法机制的必然要求,以保障人民的知情权、参与权、表达权、监督权。《人民检察院案件信息公开工作规定(试行)》和"人民检察院案件信息公开网"为检察机关案件信息公开制度提供了制度基础和配套条件,上海等司法改革前沿地区也对此进行了有益的探索。但该制度的当前实践还存在不理想的状况,制度内容还存在诸多缺陷与疏漏。应当充分吸收司法改革前沿地区的探索成果,确立"以公开为原则,以不公开为例外"的基本原则,明晰法律文书公开的类型,完善公开审查机制,建立硬性的约束机制,完善救济程序,以及建立科学的考评机制,充分展示个案中的公平正义。 The system of procuratorial organ's case information disclosure is part of the current judicial reform. Procuratorial organ's case information disclosure is a further development of the previous "procuratorial affairs disclosure",which is the inevitable requirement of establishing sunshine judicial system,to protect the people's right to know,right to participate,right to express and right to supervise. The Provisions on the Work of the People's Procuratorate's Case Information Disclosure( For Trial Implementation) and "the website of case information disclosure of the People's Procuratorate"have provided the institutional foundation and supportive conditions for it. The judicial reform of frontier areas,like Shanghai,has also carried out such beneficial exploration. But the current practice of that system is not ideal,and its content still has several defects and limitations. In order to exhibit fairness and justice in every case,the exploration achievement obtained by the frontier areas of judicial reform should be fully absorbed. We should establish the principle of "disclosure as a principle,non- disclosure as an exception"in the system,clarify the types of legal documents' disclosure,improve the public review mechanism,and set up a rigid constraint mechanism and a scientific evalua-tion mechanism.
出处 《昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2016年第6期34-45,共12页 Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基金 最高人民检察院检察理论研究一般课题"检察机关案件信息公开制度"(GJ2015C10)
关键词 司法改革 检察机关案件信息公开 检务公开 阳光司法机制 judicial reform procuratorial organ's case information disclosure procuratorial affairs disclosure "sunshine judicial mechanism"
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献72

  • 1王新光.检务公开的范围和分类[J].人民检察,2002(7):37-38. 被引量:4
  • 2舒国滢.从司法的广场化到司法的剧场化──一个符号学的视角[J].政法论坛,1999,17(3):12-19. 被引量:248
  • 3聂凤峻.论目的与手段的相互关系[J].文史哲,1998(6):75-78. 被引量:26
  • 4《现代汉语词典》,商务印书馆2008年版,第1271页.
  • 5刘杰.知情权与信息公开[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2005:6.
  • 6罗杰·科特威尔.法律社会学导论[M].北京:华夏出版社,1989.131.
  • 7克劳斯·罗科信.刑事诉讼法[M].北京:法律出版社,2003.
  • 8托比·曼德尔著.信息自由:多国法律比较(第2版)[M].龚文庠等译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2011.
  • 9《〈中共中央关于全面推进依法治国若干重大问题的决定〉辅导读本》,人民出版社2014年版,第5、5 、2、2、36、36、5、5-6、36页.
  • 10Thomas M.Susan.好的,坏的,丑的:电子政府与人民的知情权[J].交流,2002(3).

共引文献4

引证文献5

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部