期刊文献+

血清D-二聚体、CA-199、CA-125、CA-724及CEA对鉴别胰腺癌和慢性胰腺炎的临床应用价值 被引量:2

Clinical Value of Serum Level of D-dimer,CA-199,CA-125,CA-724 and CEA for Differential Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer and Chronic Pancreatitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨血清D-二聚体、CA-199、CA-125、CA-724和CEA在慢性胰腺炎和胰腺癌鉴别诊断中的临床应用价值。方法方便选取无锡市第二人民医院2012年1月—2015年12月收治的胰腺癌患者30例、慢性胰腺炎患者30例,分别作为胰腺癌组和慢性胰腺炎组并检测D-二聚体、CA-199、CA-125、CA-724及CEA 5个观察指标。两组分别使用免疫比浊法进行血浆D-二聚体检测以及使用化学发光法进行4个肿瘤标志物检测。结果胰腺癌组D-二聚体值(1.67±0.26)、CA-199值(462.1±126.5)、CA-125值(330.7±133.2)、CA724值(16.4±10.52)和CEA值(31.84±12.39);慢性胰腺炎组D-二聚体值(0.22±0.04)、CA-199值(83.69±33.36)、CA-125值(15.97±2.78)、CA724值(9.54±7.68)和CEA值(4.44±0.76)。其中D-二聚体、CA-199、CA-125及CEA检测值在胰腺癌组显著高于在慢性胰腺炎组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。另外,D-二聚体在两组比较中敏感性和特异性分别为60.0%和96.7%;CA-199敏感性及特异性分别是66.7%和70.0%;CA-125的敏感性和特异性分别是63.3%和86.7%;CEA的敏感性和特异性分别是33.3%和90.0%,其中D-二聚体、CA-199、CA-125个指标在两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 D-二聚体、CA-199和CA-125在鉴别慢性胰腺炎和胰腺癌具有较好应用价值,总体来说综合敏感性和特异性的检测结果 ,D-二聚体指标在鉴别诊断应用方面优于CA-199和CA-125。 Objective To explore clinical value of D-dimer,CA-199,CA-125,CA-724 and CEA for differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer(PC) and chronic pancreatitis(CP). Methods Convenient selection 30 patients with pancreatic cancer and 30 patients with chronic pancreatitis from January 2012 to December 2015 were enroll ed to PC group and CP group respectively and the sserum level of D-dimer,CA-199,CA-125,CA-724 and CEA were tested in this retrospective analysis. The serum level of D-dimer was detected by immunoturbidimetry and the serum level of four tumor markers was detected by chemiluminescence. Results Level of D-dimer,CA-199,CA-125,CA-724 and CEA in CP group are(0.22±0.04),(83.69 ±33.36),(15.97 ±2.78),(9.54 ±7.68) and(4.44 ±0.76), respectively while in PC group are(1.67 ±0.26),(462.1±126.5),(330.7±133.2), 16.4±10.52) and(31.84±12.39), respectively. The level of D-dimer,CA-199,CA-125 and CEA are significantly higher in PC group than those in CP group(P〈0.05).Sensitivity and specificity of D-Dimer are 60.0%and 96.7% in PC versus CP group, while sensitivity and specificity of CA-199 are 66.7% and 70.0%; CA-125 63.3% and86.7%; 33.3% and 90.0% for CEA. The sensitivity and specificity difference are significant in D-dimer, CA-199 and CA-125 between the two groups(P〈0.05). Conclusion In differential diagnosis for pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis,serum level of D-dimer and CA-199, CA-125 have shown promising value. Generally speaking, combined with both sensitivity and specificity test D-dimer is more applicable than the tumor markers.
出处 《中外医疗》 2016年第33期4-6,共3页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 D-二聚体 肿瘤标志物 胰腺癌 慢性胰腺炎 D-dimer Tumor marker Pancreatic cancer Chronic pancreatitis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献30

  • 1Liao, Quan,Zhao, Yu-Pei,Yang, Ying-Chi,Li, Li-Jun,Long, Xiao,Han, Shao-Mei.Combined detection of serum tumor markers for differential diagnosis of solid lesions located at the pancreatic head[J].Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International,2007,6(6):641-645. 被引量:27
  • 2吴晰,陆星华,徐彤,钱家鸣,赵平,郭晓钟,杨晓鸥,蒋卫君.肿瘤标志物、K-ras和p53突变对胰腺癌诊断的价值[J].中华内科杂志,2005,44(10):741-744. 被引量:4
  • 3董怀平,李庆敏.D-二聚体的研究进展[J].国际检验医学杂志,2006,27(12):1134-1135. 被引量:37
  • 4朱广迎,罗京伟.放射肿瘤学[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社2010,384.
  • 5Jandu N, Richardson M, Singh G, et al. Human ovarian cancer asci- tes fluid contains a mixture of incompletely degraded soluble prod- ucts of fibrin that collectively possess an antiangiogenic property [ J]. lnt J Gynecol Cancer,2006,16(4) : 1536 - 1544.
  • 6Sun W, Ren H, Gao CT, et al. Clinical and Prognostic Significance of Coagulation Assays in Pancreatic Cancer Patients With Absence of Venous Thromboembolism [ J]. Am J Clin Oncol, 2014 Jan 7.[ Epub ahead of print ].
  • 7Nakaizumi A, Uehara H ,Takenaka A, et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic cancer by cytology and measurement of oncogene and tumor mark- ers in pure pancreatic juice aspirated by endoscopy [ J ]. Hepatogas- troenterology, 1999,46 (25) :31 - 37.
  • 8Jemal Ahmedin,Siegel Rebecca,Ward Elizabeth,Hao Yongping,Xu Jiaquan,Murray Taylor,Thun Michael J.Cancer statistics, 2008. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians . 2008
  • 9Afina S. Glas,Jeroen G. Lijmer,Martin H. Prins,Gouke J. Bonsel,Patrick M.M. Bossuyt.The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance[J].Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.2003(11)
  • 10Taylor A. Sohn,Charles J. Yeo,John L. Cameron,Leonidas Koniaris,Sunjay Kaushal,Ross A. Abrams,Patricia K. Sauter,JoAnn Coleman,Ralph H. Hruban,Keith D. Lillemoe.Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas—616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators[J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery . 2000 (6)

共引文献30

同被引文献5

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部