2Attali, Y. 2004. Exploring the feedback and revision features of criterion [R]. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Diego, CA., America, April 2004.
4Chen, E. & E. Cheng. 2008. Beyond the design of automated writing evaluation: Pedagogical practices and perceived learning effectiveness in EFL writing classes [J]. Language Learning & Technology 12: 94-112.
5Dernyei, Z. 2007. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Methodologies [M]. Oxford: OUP.
6Elliot, S. & C. Mikulas. 2004. The impact of MY Access ! use on student writing performance.. A technology overview and four studies [R]. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA., America, April 2004.
7Ericsson, P. & R. Haswell (eds.). 2006. Machine Scoring of Student Essays : Truths and Consequences [C]. Logan, UT. : Utah State University Press.
8Grimes, D. 2008. Assessing automated assessment.. Essay evaluation software in the classroom [OL]. ftp://ftp, ics. uci. edu/pub/grimesd/AutoAssessment, pdf (accessed 20/06/2010).
9Hoon, T. 2006. Online automated essay assessment: Potentials for writing development [OL]. http://ausweb, scu. edu. au/aw06/papers/refereed/tan3/paper, html (accessed 09/08/2010).
10Landauer, T., D. Laham & P. Foltz. 2003. Automated scoring and annotation of essays with the Intelligent Essay Assessor [A]. In M. Shermis & J. Burstein (eds.). Automated Essay Scoring, A Cross-disciplinary Perspective [C]. Mahwah, N. J, : Lawrence Erlbaum 87-112.
