期刊文献+

参麦注射液辅助治疗急性心肌梗死的临床研究 被引量:20

Clinical trial of shenmai injection in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察参麦注射液辅助治疗急性心肌梗死的临床疗效及安全性。方法将72例急性心肌梗死患者随机分为对照组35例和试验组37例。对照组予以吸氧、抗凝、抗血小板等治疗;试验组在对照组治疗的基础上,予以静脉滴注参麦注射液20 mL qd。2组患者均治疗2周。比较2组患者的临床疗效和药物不良反应的发生情况。结果治疗后,试验组和对照组的总有效率分别为89.19%(33/37例)和71.43%(25/35例),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,试验组和对照组的左心室射血分数(LVEF)分别为(72.16±16.44)%,(58.43±20.06)%;E峰值分别为(88.40±8.89),(68.19±6.87)cm·s^(-1);E/A值分别为(1.27±0.13),(0.98±0.10),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,试验组和对照组的A峰值分别为(69.61±7.03),(69.58±7.01)cm·s^(-1),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗期间,试验组发生的药物不良反应有口干、过敏、恶心,对照组发生的药物不良反应有口干、过敏、头痛。试验组和对照组的药物不良反应率分别为13.51%和8.57%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论参麦注射液辅助治疗急性心肌梗死有很好的临床疗效,且不增加药物不良反应的发生率。 Objective To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of shenmai injection in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Methods A total of 72 patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomly divided into control group (n = 35 cases) and treatment group (n = 37 cases ) . Control group was given oxygen, anticoagulation, antiplatelet, and so on. Treatment group was treated with Shenmai injection 20 mL, on the basis of the control group. Two groups were treated for 2 weeks. The clinical efficacy and adverse drug reactions were compared between two groups. Results After treatment, the total effective rates of treatment and control groups were 89. 19% (33/37 cases) and 71.43% (25/35 cases), and the difference was statistically significant (P 〈0.05). After treatment, the main indexes in the treatment and control groups were compared: the left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF) were (72. 16 ±16.44)%, (58.43 ±20.06)% ; E peak were (88.40±8.89), (68.19±6.87)cm·s^-1; E/Awere (1.27±0.13), ( 0. 98 ± 0. 10), with significant difference ( P 〈 0. 05 ). After treatment, A peak in the treatment and control groups were (69.61± 7.03 ), (69.58 ±7.01 )cm·s^-1 without significant difference (P 〉0. 05). The adverse drug reactions in treatment group were dry mouth, allergies and nausea, which in control group was dry mouth, allergies and headaches. The incidence of adverse drug reactions in treatment and control groups were 13.51% and 8. 57% without significant difference (P 〉0. 05). Conclusion Shenmai injection has a good clinical efficacy and safety in treatment of acute myocardial infarction.
作者 石建 李世峰
出处 《中国临床药理学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第24期2222-2224,共3页 The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
基金 黔南民族医学高等专科学校科研基金资助项目(QNYZ2014-21)
关键词 参麦注射液 急性心肌梗死 安全性 Shenmai injection acute myocardial infarction safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献34

  • 1Collaborative Research Group of Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction.重组葡激酶与重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗急性心肌梗死的随机多中心临床试验[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(8):691-696. 被引量:43
  • 2Orso F, Maggioni AP. What is the optimal reperfusion strategy for elderly pa- tients with acute MI[J] ? Am J Geriatr Cardiol, 2006, 15:14-18.
  • 3Cleland JG, Caletta AP, Freemantle N, et al. Clinical trials update from the A- merican College of Cardiology meeting: CARE-HF and the remission of heart failure, Women's Health Study, TNT, COMPASS-HF, VERITAS, CANPAP, PEECH and PREMIER[J]. Eur J Heart Fail, 2005, 7:931-936.
  • 4Moser M, Bode C. Pharmacology and clinical trial results of saruplase (scuPA) in acute myocardial infarction [ J ]. Expert Opin Investig Drugs, 1999, 8 : 329- 335.
  • 5Moser M, Kohler B, Schmitmer M, et al. Recombinant plasminogen activators:a comparative review of the clinical pharmacology and therapeutic use of alteplase and reteplase[J]. BioDrugs, 1998, 9:455-463.
  • 6Stepitska J, Sadowski Z, Szajewski T, et al. Calcium blocker therapy before myocardial infarction increases post-infarction short-and long-term mortality. Da- ta from the INJECT trial[J]. Kardiol Pal, 2002, 57:512-519.
  • 7VanI Hof AW, Ten Berg J, Heestermans T, et al. Prehospital initiation of tirofiban in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty ( On-TIME 2 ) : a muhicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2008, 372: 537-546.
  • 8Widimsky P, Bilkova D, Penicka M, et all. Long-term outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to hospitals without catheterization laboratory and randomized to immediate thrombolysis or interhospital transport for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Five years'follow-up of the PRAGUE- 2 Trial[J]. Eur Heart .J. 2007,28:670-684.
  • 9Hermlann HC, Lu J, Brodie BR, et al. Benefit of facilitated percutaneous coro- nary intervention in high-risk ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients presenting to nonpereutaneous coronary intervention hospitals[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv , 2009, 2:917-924.
  • 10Johanson P, Fu Y, Wagner GS, et al. ST resolution 1 hour after fibrinolysis for prediction of myocardial infarct size: insights from ASSENT 3 [ J ]. Am J Cardiol, 2009, 103 : 154-158.

共引文献2014

同被引文献735

引证文献20

二级引证文献268

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部