期刊文献+

多西他赛注射液与卡培他滨片治疗进展期胃癌的临床研究 被引量:9

Clinical trial of docetaxel injection and capecitabine tablets in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察在奥沙利铂注射液基础治疗下,多西他赛注射液与卡培他滨片(DOX方案)治疗进展期胃癌的临床疗效及安全性。方法将65例进展期胃癌患者分为A组30例、B组18例、C组17例。A组予以第1天奥沙利铂130mg·m^(-2),静脉滴注2 h+第1天多西他赛75 mg·m^(-2),静脉滴注2 h+第1~14天口服卡培他滨1000 mg·m^(-2)bid;B组予以第1天奥沙利铂130 mg·m^(-2),静脉滴注2 h+第1~14天口服卡培他滨1000 mg·m^(-2)bid;C组予以第1天奥沙利铂130 mg·m^(-2),静脉滴注2 h+第1天多西他赛75 mg·m-2,静脉滴注2 h+第1~5天氟尿嘧啶500 mg·m^(-2),静脉滴注2 h。3组患者一个疗程均为21 d,共治疗4个疗程。比较3组患者的短期疗效、生活质量(SF-36)评分、复发情况、生存期,以及药物不良反应的发生情况。结果治疗后6个月,A、B、C组的总有效率分别为96.67%(29/30例),77.78%(14/18例),41.18%(7/17例);SF-36评分分别为(70.11±9.21),(62.42±8.43),(55.45±7.86)分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A、B、C组的1年内复发率分别为0,11.11%,29.41%;1~2年内复发率分别为3.32%,26.67%,50.00%;2~3年内复发率分别为11.54%,33.33%,66.67%,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A、B、C组的平均生存期分别为(2.80±0.35),(2.22±0.55),(1.65±0.46)年,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。3组患者的主要药物不良反应为血液学毒性、腹泻、恶心和呕吐、手足病变、肝毒性,且A、B、C组的药物不良反应发生率分别为16.67%,22.22%和58.82%,A、B组与C组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 DOX方案治疗进展期胃癌的临床疗效确切、药物不良反应轻微、复发率低,可延长患者的生存期,改善患者的生活质量。 Objective To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of docetaxel and capecitabine (DOX) in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, on the basis treatment with oxaliplatin. Methods Sixty -five patients with advanced gastric cancer were divided into groups A, B, C with 30,18,17 cases, respectively. Group A was given oxaliplatin 130 mg·m^-2 day 1 intravenous infusion for 2 h ± docetaxel 75 mg·m^-2 day 1, intravenous infusion for 2 h ± capecitabine 1000 mg·m^-2, day 1 -14, oral, b/d. Group B was given oxaliplatin 130 mg·m^-2, day 1, in- travenous infusion for 2 h; capecitabine 1000 mg·m^-2, day 1 - 14, oral, bid. Group C was given oxaliplatin 130 mg·m^-2, day 1 , intravenous infusion for 2 h; docetaxel 75 mg·m^-2, day 1 , intravenous infusion for 2 h, fluorouracil 500 mg·m^-2, day 1 - 5 , intravenous injection 2 h. Three groups were treated for four courses with 21 days per course. The short - term efficacy, quality of life ( SF - 36) score, recurrence, survival and adverse drug reactions were compared between three groups. Results Six months after treatment, the total effective rates of A, B and C groups were 96. 67% (29/30 cases), 77.78% (14/18 cases), 41.18% (7/17 cases); the SF - 36 scores were ( 70. 11 ±9.21 ) , ( 62.42 ± 8.43 ), ( 55.45 ± 7.86 ) points, with significance difference (P 〈 0. 05). In the groups A, B, C, the recurrence in 1 year were 0, 11.11%, 29.41% ; the recurrence in 1 - 2 years were 3.32%, 26. 67%, 50. 00% ;the recurrence in 2 -3 years were 11.54%, 33.33%, 66. 67%, with signifi- cant difference ( P 〈 0.05 ). The average survival time of groups A, B and C were (2.80 ± 0. 35 ), (2. 22±0. 55 ) , ( 1.65 ± 0. 46) years with significant difference (P 〈 0. 05 ). The main adverse drug reactions in the three groups were based on hematologic toxicity, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, hand - foot disease and hepatotoxicity. The incidences of adverse drug reaction rates in groups A, B and C were 16. 67% , 22.22% and 58.82%, the differences between groups A, B and C were significant ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion DOX has a definitive clinical efficacy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, which has a low adverse drug reaction rate and low recurrence rate. DOX can improve the survival time and quality of life for patients with advanced gastric cancer.
作者 周明利
出处 《中国临床药理学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第24期2243-2246,共4页 The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
关键词 奥沙利铂 多西他赛 卡培他滨 进展期胃癌 安全性 oxaliplatin docetaxel capecitabine advanced gastric cancer safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献55

  • 1Cunningham D,Allum WH,Stenning SP,菅鑫妍.手术期间化学疗法与单独手术治疗可切除的胃食管癌疗效比较[J].中国处方药,2006,5(8):59-60. 被引量:434
  • 2孙建军,马建芳,陈少华.动脉灌注化疗联合栓塞治疗晚期胃癌[J].江西医学院学报,2006,46(4):138-139. 被引量:5
  • 3陈晓耕,林志彬.局部晚期胃癌的新辅助化疗的临床研究[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2006,27(11):1297-1299. 被引量:8
  • 4胡伟刚,章真,徐志勇,顾卫列,陆惠忠,何少琴.三维适形与调强放疗技术在胃癌术后放疗中的剂量学比较[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2007,16(4):273-276. 被引量:35
  • 5Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013[ J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2013,63:11 -30.
  • 6Agrawal A, Purandare N, Shah S, et al. Response assessment in metronomic chemotherapy: RECIST or PERCIST[ J ]. Indian J Nucl Med, 2014,29:74 - 80.
  • 7Therasse P, Arbuek SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors[ J]. J Natl Cancer lnst, 2000,92:205 - 216.
  • 8Cervantes A, Roda D, Tarazona N, et al. Current questions for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer[ J]. Cancer Treat Rev, 2013, 39:60 - 67.
  • 9GASTRIC (Global Advanced/Adjuvant Stomach Tumor Research International Collaboration) Groupl, Oba K, Paoletti X, et al. Role of chemotherapy for advanced/recurrent gastric cancer: an individual - patient - data meta - analysis[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2013, 49 : 1565 - 1577.
  • 10Sanfo_rd M. S - 1 (Teysuno ) : a review of its use in advanced gastric cancer in non - Asian populations[J]. Drugs, 2013,73:845 -855.

共引文献89

同被引文献69

引证文献9

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部