期刊文献+

特罗凯对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的有效性与安全性 被引量:2

To Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Tarceva on 24 Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨特罗凯治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的有效性与安全性方法 收集2015年1月至2016年2月在我院治疗的经病理证实的晚期NSCLC患者24例。给予特罗凯150mg/次,口服,每天1次,直至病情进展或出现严重不良反应而停止治疗。按照RECIST实体瘤疗效评价标准和美国国家癌症研究院(NCI)的毒性评价标准来评价特罗凯的临床疗效和不良反应。结果 24例患者均可评价疗效和毒副作用。疗效方面:完全缓解(CR)0例,部分缓解(PR)4例,疾病稳定(SD)15例,疾病进展(PD)5例,客观有效率16.7%,疾病控制率79.2%,中位无进展生存期(PFS)5.1个月(1.1~13.6个月),中位生存时间6.4个月(4.3~15.0个月)。常见不良反应有皮疹(83.3%),多为CTC1、2级,经对症治疗后好转,未出现严重不良反应。结论 特罗凯对晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效明显,安全性好,值得临床使用。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of Tarceva in the treatment of patients with advanced non - small cell lung cancer. Methods 24 cases of advanced non - small cell lung cancer were collected from January, 2015 to February, 2016. All patients were given Tarceva 150mg once daily until disease progress or severe side effect. The efficacy was evaluated accord- ing to Response Evaluation Criterion Solid Tumors (RECIST)criteria, the adverse events were evaluated according to the National Canc- er Institute (NCI) criteria. Results 24 cases could be evaluated in the efficacy and adverse reactions. Four patients got partial re- sponse, fifteen patients got stable disease and five had disease progression. The response rate was 16.7% , the disease control rate was 79.2% , the median progression - free survival time was 5.1 months ( 1.1 - 13.6 months ), and the median survival time was 6.4 months (4.3 -15.0 months). The common side effect were skin rash (83.3%) which were almost grade 1 or 2. The patients with side effect got remission by Symptomatic treatment. Conclusion Tarceva therapy is effective and safe for patients with advanced non - small cell lung cancer, so the treatment is worth clinical use.
出处 《牡丹江医学院学报》 2016年第6期18-21,共4页 Journal of Mudanjiang Medical University
基金 江西省科技支撑计划项目(20121BBG70053)
关键词 特罗凯 晚期 非小细胞肺癌 有效性 安全性 Tarceva advanced non -small cell lung cancer efficacy safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献44

  • 1陈智伟,廖美琳,陈玉蓉,赵家美,张心敏,成柏君.WHO标准和RECIST标准评价肺癌化疗疗效的比较[J].循证医学,2004,4(2):83-84. 被引量:34
  • 2周贤,陈海泉.肺疝[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2004,20(3):191-191. 被引量:5
  • 3谭棠基,何发,卢桂尧,胡国良,练卫东,张伟超,王明清.左前胸壁肺疝一例[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2007,14(1):35-35. 被引量:3
  • 4陆舜,李子明,成柏君,虞永峰,廖美琳,叶云.厄洛替尼治疗复治晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床分析[J].中国癌症杂志,2007,17(9):711-715. 被引量:46
  • 5Salomon DS,Brandt R,Ciardiello F,et al.Epidermal growth factor-related peptides and their receptors in human malignancies[J].Crit Rev Oncol Hematot,1995,19:183-232.
  • 6Fontanini G,De Laurentiis M,Vignati S,et al.Evaluation of epidermal growth factor-related growth factors and receptors and of neoangiogenesis in completely resected stage Ⅰ-Ⅲ A non-small cell lung cancer:amphiregulin and microvessel count are independent prognostic indicators of survival[f].Clin Cancer Res,1998,4:241-249.
  • 7Grunwald V,Hidalgo M.Developing inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor receptor for cancer treatment[J].J Natl Cancer Inst,2003,95:851-867.
  • 8Shepherd FA,Rodrigues J,Ciuleanu T,et al.Erlotinib in previously treated non-small cell lung cancer[J].N Engl J Med,2005,353:123-132.
  • 9Bezjak A,Shepherd F,Tu D,et al.Symptone response in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with erlotinib:quality of life analysis of the NCIC CTG BR.21 trial[C].ASCO,2005.
  • 10Fukuoka M,Yano S,Giaccone G,et al.Multi-institutional randomized phase Ⅱ trial of gefitinib for previously treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (the IDEAL Trial)[J].J Clin Oncol,2003,21:2237-2246.

共引文献1580

同被引文献14

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部