摘要
何晏、王弼是魏晋义理易学的领军人物。由于两人的贵"无"论哲学并不完全相同,所以对六十四卦"时义"形成原因的解释存在差异:王弼将事物变化动因归于自然之性,"时义"反映的是事物自身发展变化的规律,故用社会人事解易。何晏思想比较芜杂,在汉易与王弼新说之间徘徊,留下了"自言不解《易》九事"的时代困惑。
He Yan (d. 249) and Wang Bi (226-249) were two leading figures of the meanings-and-principles school of Chan- ges scholarship in the Wei (220-265) and (265-420) dynasties. In spite of the fact both of them were advocates wu 无 (lit., nonbeing), there were some discrepancies between their arguments. On this account, their views on the cause of formation of the shi yi (significance of time) of the sixty-four hexagrams were different from each other. Wang Bi ascribed the motivation of the changes and transformations of the myriad things to the natural character of nature; and holding that what the "signifi- cance of time" reflected was the law of changes and developments of things themselves, he applied it to human affairs. Wave- ring between the Han (206 BCE-220 CE) Yi tradition and Wang Bi's new interpretation, He Yan's thought was miscellane- ous and left the perplexity of his time with "nine items of difficulties in interpreting the Changes."
出处
《周易研究》
CSSCI
2016年第6期27-34,共8页
Studies of Zhouyi
基金
国家社会科学基金项目:"<周易>与魏晋玄学"(12BZS024)
关键词
时义
卦气
自然
何晏
王弼
significance of time
gua-qi
nature
He Yan
Wang Bi