学术型硕士学位论文质量评价的实证分析

An Empirical Analysis of the Quality Evaluation of the Academic Master's Degree Thesis

为探索硕士学位论文质量评价的内容要素和影响因素,对国内某综合性高校近两年1 185篇学术型硕士学位论文评阅结果进行了统计分析。结果表明,该校学术型硕士学位论文评阅结果均值基本呈正态分布,成绩优良率高,总体质量良好。论文盲审结果明显低于明审结果,盲审结果相对客观,明审结果存在虚高现象。按各分项指标及学科大类进行描述统计,发现大部分评阅专家认为论文的选题还是很有理论意义或应用价值的;人文社科类论文的研究成果得分低于良好,说明其创新性不够;自然科学类论文的文献综述和研究成果较好,但论文写作方面有待提高。对评阅总体评价与6个分项指标进行多元线性回归分析,构建了回归方程。

Based on the 1185 master＇ s degree papers results on a comprehensive domestic university in the past two years, we ex- plored the factors which influencing the quality evaluation of master＇ s degree thesis. The empirical results show that the averages is basic normally distributed and the overall quality is good. The blind review results significantly lower than the normal way, but it＇ s more credible. With the description statistics by six sub-index and two subject categories , most experts think the selected topic of thesis has important value in theory and practice; The lower scores of ＂research results＂ on humanities and social sciences papers show the innovation is not enough. It scores higher on ＂literature review＂ and ＂research results＂ of natural science papers, but the ＂paper writing＂ needs to be improved.