期刊文献+

可液化砂土微生物处置试验 被引量:9

An experimental study of microorganism's treatment on liquefiable sands
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为科学评价实验室试样尺度下MICP对可液化砂土的加固效果,采用监测营养盐注浆过程中压力变化和铵根离子量变化方法,比较试样尺度放大和注浆流速变化条件下可液化砂土的刚度和渗透性差异.试验结果表明:以巴氏芽孢八叠球菌为菌液、乙酸钙和尿素为营养盐,采用间歇式注浆方式制备固化砂土试样,注浆过程中试样内部压力变化和铵根离子变化能够有效表征可液化砂土的MICP加固效果;试样尺度放大时,依据面积比设计注浆流速,灌浆压力显著降低,试样成矿均匀性显著提高.监测试样压力变化和铵根离子变化,是研究可液化砂土微生物处置效果的简单和非破坏性试验方法.MICP应用实践中,随着试样尺度的放大,需要兼顾刚度、成矿均匀性和注浆流速之间的平衡. To evaluate the sand consolidation effect of MICP under the condition of the laboratory, the stiffness and permeability of the liquefied sand samples of different size under different grouting flow velocity were analyzed by monitoring the change of internal pressure and the amount of ammonium ion in the process of the grouting of nutrient salt. Sporosarcina pasteurii was selected to produce bacteria liquid, with nutritive salts, such as calcium acetate and urea. The intermittent grouting method was applied to produce solidified sand samples. Results show that the MICP modification effect can be effectively characterized with the variation of internal pressure and the concentration of ammonium during grouting. When grouting velocity is designed according to the area ratio, the grouting pressure is significantly lower down and mineralization uniformity is significantly improved along with the sample size increasing. Monitoring the change of the pressure and the amount of ammonium ion is a simple and non-destructive method for the study of the effect of the microbial treatment of liquefied sand soil. In the application of MICP , the design of grouting should consider both rigidity and mineralization uniformity when the sample size is enlarged.
出处 《哈尔滨工业大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第12期103-107,共5页 Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology
基金 科技基础性工作专项资助项目(2014FY110600)
关键词 液化砂土 MICP P波 S波 压强 氨根离子 liquefiable sands MICP P wave S wave pressure ammonium ( NH4^+ )
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献39

  • 1杨和平,贺迎喜,江唯伟.微生物影响岩土工程的现状及用微生物技术改良膨胀土的思考[J].中外公路,2007,27(4):228-231. 被引量:9
  • 2Mitchell J, Santamarina J. Biological considerations ingeotechnical engineering[J]. Journal of Geotechnical andGeoenvironmental Engineering, 2005, 131(10):1222-1233.
  • 3William BW, David CC, William JW. Prokaryotes: Theunseen majority[J]. Proceedings of the National Academyof Sciences of the United States of America, 1998, 95(12):6578-6583.
  • 4Harkes MP, van Paassen LA, Booster JL, et al. Fixationand distribution of bacterial activity in sand to inducecarbonate precipitation for ground reinforcement[ J].Ecological Engineering, 2010, 36(2): 112-117.
  • 5DeJong JT, Mortensen BM, Martinez BC, et al.Bio-mediated soil improvement^J]. Ecological Engineering,2010,36(2): 197-210.
  • 6Martinez BC, DeJong JT, Ginn TR, et al. Experimentaloptimization of microbial-induced carbonate precipitationfor soil improvement[J]. Journal of Geotechnical andGeoenvironmental Engineering, 2013, 139(4); 587.
  • 7Hata T, Tsukamoto M, Inagaki Y, et al. Evaluation ofmultiple soil improvement techniques based on microbialfunctionsfJ]. Geotechnical Special Publication, 2011(211):3945-3955.
  • 8Fauriel S, Laloui L. A bio-chemo-hydro-mechanical modelfor microbially induced calcite precipitation in soils[J].Computers and Geotechnics, 2012(46): 104-120.
  • 9Dejong JT, Caslake LF, Chen CY, et al. Biogeochemicalprocesses and geotechnical applications: Progress,opportunities and challenges[J]. Geotechnique, 2013, 63(4):287-301.
  • 10Mitchell A, Phillips A, Hiebert R, et al. Biofilm enhancedgeologic sequestration of supercritical C02[J]-International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2009,3(1): 90-99.

共引文献15

同被引文献89

引证文献9

二级引证文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部