摘要
通过主诊医师组住院医疗绩效评价的实践,探讨应用DRG组数与低风险组死亡率等经典指标评价神经专科主诊医师组绩效的可行性。分析发现由于DRG分组将相似的诊断与治疗归入同一DRG组,力求利用有限的DRG组数实现同类患者的比较,对于具体某个亚专业的主诊医师组,可能并不适用于采用DRG组数评价医疗服务范围,但对于无明确亚专业方向的主诊医师组,划定DRG组范围,评价诊疗能力依然是目前有限的较客观的评价方式。在评价主诊医师组的医疗安全方面,存在低风险组死亡率等指标失效的情况,构建死亡率指数进行评价,能够保证指标可测量。
By attending group practice of medical performance evaluation, to discuss feasibility of evaluating attending group's performanceusing-DRG number, low risk group mortality and other classic indicators. An analysis found since DRG grouping by the similar diagnosis and treatment, seek to take advantage of the limited number of DRG groups to compare similar patients. So for a specific sub-specialty attending group, does not apply to the use of DRG number to evaluate medical range, but for a non-specific sub-specialty attending group, mealdaf range can be evaluated by delineation of the DRG scope. In the evaluation of medical safety aspects of attendins groups, the presence of low risk group mortality indicators of failure, construction mortality indicators to evaluate can ensure indicators be measured.
作者
仇叶龙
李小莹
冀冰心
张艳红
王力红
Qiu Yelong Li Xiaoying Ji Bingxin ZhangYanhong Wang Lihong(Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University,Beijing 100053, China)
出处
《中国病案》
2016年第12期45-47,共3页
Chinese Medical Record
基金
北京地区三级甲等综合医院临床科室医疗质量关键指标比较研究(14JDZHB021)
关键词
DRG
神经科
主诊组
绩效评价
DRG
Department of neurology
DRG number
The attending group
Performance evaluation