期刊文献+

MoCA在阳江地区血管性认知障碍诊断中的临床应用研究

Clinical application of Mo CA in the diagnosis of vascular cognitive impairment in Yangjiang area
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨MoCA在阳江地区血管性认知障碍诊断中的临床应用价值。方法选取阳江地区60例年龄≥65岁的血管性认知障碍的患者(痴呆组21例、非痴呆组39例)及60例年龄≥65岁认知功能正常者(对照组)为研究对象,采用MoCA量表及MMSE量表进行认知能力检测。比较两组的检测结果,分析MoCA量表的检测价值。结果痴呆组的MoCA评分、MMSE评分低于非痴呆组,非痴呆组的MoCA评分、MMSE评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。痴呆组的MoCA评分的敏感点为90.4%,准确度为95.2%。非痴呆组为84.6%、94.9%,均高于MMSE评分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 MoCA在阳江地区血管性认知障碍诊断中的应用效果较好,敏感性和准确度较高,值得推广。 Objective To investigate the clinical application value of MoCA in the diagnosis of vascular cognitive impairment in Yangjiang area.Methods 60 patients with vascular cognitive impairment over 65 years old in Yangjiang area (21 cases in dementia group and 39 cases in non-dementia group)and 60 patients with normal cognitive function over 65 years old (the con-trol group)were selected as the research objects.Their cognitive abilities were tested by MoCA and MMSE scales.The results of the two groups were compared,and the application value of MoCA was analyzed.Results The MoCA scores and MMSE scores of dementia group were lower than those in non-dementia group,and the MoCA scores and MMSE scores in non-dementia group were lower than those in control group,and the differences were statistically significant (P〈0.05).The sensitivity and accuracy of MoCA scale were 90.4% and 95.2% respectively in the dementia group,as well as 84.6% and 94.9% in non-dementia group.The sensitivity and accuracy of MoCA scale were higher than MMSE,and the differences were statistically significant (P〈0.05).Conclusion MoCA is effective in the diagnosis of vascular cognitive impairment in Yangjiang area,and the sensi-tivity and accuracy are higher.It is worth popularizing.
出处 《河南医学研究》 CAS 2016年第12期2127-2129,共3页 Henan Medical Research
基金 基金项目:阳科通[2015]5号
关键词 MOCA 阳江地区 血管性认知障碍 临床应用 MoCA Yangjiang area vascular cognitive impairment clinical application
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献64

  • 1贾建平.重视血管性认知障碍的早期诊断和干预[J].中华神经科杂志,2005,38(1):4-6. 被引量:265
  • 2刘慧英,诸雪萍,付苏娜,王钧.老年人血管性痴呆的临床特点分析[J].实用老年医学,2005,19(5):273-274. 被引量:14
  • 3廖小平,文国强,陈涛,龙志刚,欧阳锋,李天炼,王冰雁.急性脑梗死患者认知功能障碍与病灶部位的相关性研究[J].中风与神经疾病杂志,2007,24(1):71-72. 被引量:49
  • 4! Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state'1 / A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patient1 for the clinician[J]. J Psychiatr Res, 1975, 12(3):189-198. /.
  • 5Tombaugh TN, Mclntyre NJ. The mini-mental state examina- tion: a comprehensive review[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 1992, 40 (9):922-935.
  • 6Blake H, McKinney M, Treece K, et al. An evaluation of screenifig measures for cognitive impairment after stroke[J].Age Ageing, 2002, 31(6):451-456.
  • 7Srikanth V, Thrift AG, Fryer JL, et al. The validity of brief screening cognitive instruments in the diagnosis of cognitive impairment and dementia after first-ever stroke[J]. Int Psycho- geriatr, 2006, 18(2):295-305.
  • 8Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, B6dirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2005, 53(4):695- 699.
  • 9Haehinski V, Iadecola C, Petersen RC, et al. National Insti- tute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network vascular cognitive impairment harmonization standards [J]. Stroke, 2006, 37(9):2220"-2241.
  • 10Hoops S, Nazem S, Siderowf AD, et al. Validity of the MoCA and MMSE in the detection of MCI and dementia in Parkin- son disease[J]. Neurology, 2009, 73(21):1738-1745.

共引文献128

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部