期刊文献+

注水肠镜改善退镜时肠道清洁度的随机对照研究 被引量:8

Water-infusion technique improved the bowel cleanliness during withdrawing the colonscopy: a randomized controlled study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的采用随机对照试验,比较注水肠镜与传统注气肠镜退镜时的肠道清洁度,探讨注水肠镜的优势。方法选择行非麻醉肠镜检查患者222例,随机分为注水肠镜组(A组)112例和注气肠镜组(B组)110例,比较退镜时肠道清洁度评分与退镜-进镜评分,同时对比患者疼痛评分、肠镜达盲肠时间、插镜深度、全结肠检查率、结直肠腺瘤检出率、操作者主观难易度及检查相关并发症等多项指标。结果 A组退镜清洁度评分明显高于B组[M(8)/IQR(1)vs M(8)/IQR(2),P=0.000],A组退镜-进镜清洁度评分明显高于B组[(0.53±0.74)vs(0.23±0.55),P=0.000],并且A组患者腺瘤检出率(ADR)高于B组(36.61%vs23.64%,P=0.041),A组患者术中腹痛评分明显低于B组[M(2)/IQR(1)vs M(4)/IQR(2),P=0.000];A组操作者主观评价明显优于B组[M(1)/IQR(1)vs M(2)/IQR(1),P=0.005],两组患者在达盲时间、插镜深度和全结肠检查率等方面比较,差异无统计学意义。结论注水肠镜显著改善退镜时的肠道清洁度,同时提高ADR,减轻患者不适感,并且不增加达盲时间。 Objective To compare the effect of water-infusion colonoscopy and conventional air-infusion colonoscopy on the bowel cleanliness during withdrawing.Methods A single blind randomized controlled trial was conducted. 222 patients were randomly divided into water-infusion group (group A, 112 cases) and air-infusion group (group B, 110 cases). The cleanliness scores, scores improvement, pain scores, time of reaching cecum, depth of colonoscopy, rate of whole colon examination, adenoma detection rate (ADR), operator’s dififculty and complications were compared between the two groups.Results The cleanliness score during withdrawing was higher in group A [M(8)/IQR(1) vs M(8)/IQR(2),P = 0.000], the improvement was higher in group A [(0.53 ± 0.74) vs (0.23 ± 0.55), P = 0.000], the abdominal pain score was signiifcantly lower in group A [M(2)/IQR(1) vs M(4)/IQR(2),P = 0.000] and the ADR was higher in group A (36.61 % vs 23.64 %,P = 0.041). The operator’s dififculty evaluation score was signiifcantly lower in group A [M(1)/IQR(1) vs M(2)/IQR(1),P = 0.005]. There were no signiifcant differences at the time of reaching cecum, the depth of colonoscopy and the whole colon examination rate between the two groups.Conclusion Water-infusion colonoscopy could signiifcantly improve the bowel cleanliness during withdrawing scope, improve the ADR and reduce abdominal pain of patients, without increasing the time to reach cecum.
出处 《中国内镜杂志》 北大核心 2016年第12期62-65,共4页 China Journal of Endoscopy
关键词 肠道清洁度 注水肠镜 注气肠镜 bowel cleanliness water-infusion colonoscopy air-infusion colonoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献35

  • 1周丽雅 ,杨云生 ,袁耀宗 ,李兆申 ,胡品津 ,林三仁 .复方聚乙二醇用于内镜检查前结肠准备的多中心随机对照临床研究[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2004,21(5):324-327. 被引量:96
  • 2杨林,姚珊珊,刘希双,王光兰,戴素美,张海燕.复方聚乙二醇电解质散在结肠镜术前肠道准备中的应用[J].中国药房,2007,18(8):605-607. 被引量:20
  • 3MANES G, AMATO A, ARENA M, et al. Efficacy and accept- ability of sodium picosulphate/magnesium citrate versus low-vol- ume PEG-ascorbic acid for colon cleansing: a randomized con- trolled trial[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2013, 15(9): 1145-1153.
  • 4CALDERWOOD AH, JACOBSON BC. Comprehensive validation of the boston bowel preparation scale [J]. Gastrointest Endosc,2010, 72(4): 686-692.
  • 5MEZA R, JEON J, RENEHAN AG, et al. Colorectal cancer in- cidence trends in the United States and United kingdom: evi- dence of right- to left-sided biological gradients with implications for screening[J]. Cancer Res, 2010, 70(13): 5419-5429.
  • 6SADAHIRO S, OHMURA T, SAITO T, et al. Relationship be- tween length and surface area of each segment of the large in- testine and the incidence of coloreetal cancer [J]. Cancer, 1991, 68(1): 84-87.
  • 7GUPTA S, BALASUBRAMANIAN BA, FU T, et al. Polyps with advanced neoplasia are smaller in the fight than in the left colon: implications for colorectal cancer screening [J]. Clin Gas- troenterol Hepatol, 2012, 10(12): 1395-1401.
  • 8BRENNER H, CHANG-CLAUDE J, SEILER CM, et al. Long-term risk of eolorectal cancer after negative colonoscopy[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29(28): 3761-3767.
  • 9Zauber AG, Winawer S J, O'Brien M J, et al. C olonoscopic polypec- tomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths [ J 1. N Engl J Med,2012,366(8) :687-696.
  • 10Calderwood AH, Lai EJ, Fix OK, et al. An endoscopist-blinded, randomized, controlled trial of a simple visual aid to improve bowel preparation for screening colonoscopy [ J ]. Gastrointest Endosc ,2011,73 ( 2 ) :307-314.

共引文献61

同被引文献47

引证文献8

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部