期刊文献+

我国抵触申请规定之法理辨析 被引量:1

Probing into the Rationale for the Conflicting Application Rule
下载PDF
导出
摘要 一直以来,普遍的观点认为抵触申请规定的立法目的是为了"禁止重复授权"。但是,通过对《专利法》关于抵触申请规定的语义的理解以及对其适用条件和效果的检视,并将抵触申请规定与禁止重复授权原则和先申请原则进行比较,不难发现抵触申请规定的意义和价值绝不仅仅在于禁止重复授权。正确认识抵触申请规定的意义和价值对于在专利授权、确权程序中准确适用该规定具有重要的影响,并且有利于向公众准确地传播其立法思想。。 For a long time, it has been a prevalent view that the purpose of legislation for the conflicting application rule is to prohibit "double patenting". However, upon rereading it in the context of the Patent Law and reexamining its specific functions, and by comparing it with the rule of prohibiting double patenting as well as the first-to-file rule, it is discovered that, the rationale for the conflicting application rule is in no way for purely prohibiting double patenting. Restating the rationale for the conflicting application rule is critical to the application of the rule in prosecution and invalidation proceedings, and is also beneficial to convey the legislation value accurately.
作者 郭小军
出处 《电子知识产权》 2016年第11期27-37,共11页 Electronics Intellectual Property
关键词 损害赔偿 证据规则 法定赔偿 Secret prior art Conflicting application Double patenting First-to-file Policy consideration
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献47

  • 1美国专利商标局官方网站,http://www.uspto.gov/aia_implementation/20110916-pub-1112-29.pal.
  • 2Robert A. Armitage, "Understanding the America Invents Act and Its Implications for Patenting" , 40 AIPLA Q.J. 1, (2012).
  • 3David S. Almeling, "Seven Reasons Why Trade Secrets Are Increasingly Important" , 27 Berkeley Tech. L. J. 1091 ( 2012 ).
  • 4http://www.bitlaw.com/source/35usc-after-america-invents-act/index.html.
  • 5Toshiko Takenaka, "Has the United States Adopted a First-To-File System Through America Invents Act? A Comparative Law Analysis of Patent Priority under First-Inventor-To-File" , GRUR Int. 2012, Heft 4, p304, n3.
  • 6Martin J. Adlem, Randall R. Rad d John R. Thomas, Cases and Materials on Patent Law, 3rd ed., 2009.
  • 7Robert P. Merges and John F. Duffy, Patent Law and Policy: Cases and Materials, 5th ed., 2011.
  • 835 U.S.C. § 102.
  • 9Martin J. Adlem, Randall R. Rader and John R. Thomas, Cases and Materials on Patent Law, 3rd ed. 2009, pp156-7.
  • 10Martin J. Adlem, Randall R. Rader and John R. Thomas, Cases and Materials on Patent Law, 3rd ed. 2009, p181.

共引文献13

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部