摘要
目的 :对比分析采用药物流产与人工流产的方法为早孕患者终止妊娠的临床效果。方法 :选取近年来我院收治的要求终止妊娠的早孕患者200例作为研究对象,将其随机分为A组(100例)和B组(100例),采用药物流产的方法为A组患者终止妊娠,采用人工流产的方法为B组患者终止妊娠,然后比较两组患者的流产效果及不良反应的发生情况。结果 :A组患者的腹痛程度明显低于B组患者,A组患者阴道持续出血的时间明显长于B组患者,A组患者月经恢复正常的时间明显长于B组患者,A组患者的并发症发生率明显低于B组患者,B组患者的流产效果明显优于A组患者,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 :采用人工流产的方法为早孕患者终止妊娠的效果较为显著,并且患者阴道持续出血的时间及月经恢复正常的时间均较短,但患者在术后的疼痛程度较为严重,并发症的发生率也较高。
Objective： To study the comparison of effect of two clinical methods commonly used to terminate women＇ s early pregnancy： medical abortion and induced abortion. Methods： 200 patients were chosen to abort pregnancy and divided into A and B groups. Each group had 100 patients. The method of medical abortion was applied into A group of patients, while the method of induced abortion B group of patients. The aim was to compare the abortion effect, recovery, and adverse reactions. Results： The patients with these two different methods of abortion have different degree of pain. A group of patients, although the pain degree is lighter than group B, the time of vaginal bleeding and menstruation recovery of A are longer than that of B, and complete abortion rate is lower than that of group B. Differences between two groups have statistical significance （P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion： In terms of termination, medical abortion and induced abortion each have advantages and disadvantages. Using induced abortion, patients though have more intense pain and high tensions, it is fairly thorough, and patients recover well. While medical abortion produces light pain to patients, easy to operate and accept, also it can cause less complication.
