期刊文献+

洪水灾害下化工装置的脆弱性评估 被引量:6

Methodology for flood vulnerability analysis of hazardous material installations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对洪水灾害下化工装置的脆弱性评估,提出了综合考虑洪水类型、装置结构特征和危险物质泄漏模式的脆弱性定量评估方法。该方法在厘定化工装置结构破坏模式、破坏等级和物质泄漏风险等级的前提下,构建洪水作用下装置的结构极限状态方程,获得结构极限状态曲线和结构失效控制参数阈值,进而得到结构破坏概率和危险物质泄漏频率,并将这两个参数作为洪水灾害脆弱性快速评估指标。以常压立式储罐为分析对象,对上述方法进行详细阐述,并结合实例验证了方法的适用性。结果表明,结构极限状态曲线可以用于快速区分结构安全状态和失效状态,临界装量系数是决定储罐洪水脆弱性的关键工艺参数,随罐壁高度和储液密度增加,洪水灾害脆弱性逐渐降低。 A short-cut quantitative assessment method for flood vulnerability of the chemical hazardous substances installations (CHSI) is proposed, which takes into account the severity of flood, the structure characteristic of CHSI and the leakage mode of hazardous materials. The methodology can be divided into three steps. At the first step, the damage state of CHSI and risk state of domino event need to be identified. The damage state is determined by the severity of leakage of hazardous materials, which is in accordance with the typical damage modes of CHSI in flooding disasters. With the help of Event Tree Analysis, the potential risk produced by the likely reaction between hazardous materials and floodwater is considered to obtain the modified risk state of domino event. At the second step, the structural or compositional maximum tolerance limit equation of CHSI under the load of flood is deduced. Base on the equation, the structural limit state function(SLSF) and the threshold of structural failure control parameter are derived. Finally, the damage probability of CHSI and the leakage frequency of hazardous materials are calculated, which are chosen as the indicative parameters of the flood vulnerability of CHSI. Taking the atmospheric storage tank as a case study sample, the above methodology is tested and illustrated in detail. The results show that for the damage mode of collapse of tank wall, the SLSF is a set of straight lines indicating the relation be- tween the square of the flood velocity and the flood depth. For the damage mode of displacement of the entire tank caused by buoy- ancy of floodwater, the SLSF can only be determined by the flood depth. Base on the deduced SLSF for atmospheric storage tank, another detailed case study of a tank farm close to a river is giv- en. It is found that the limit state function can be used to distin- guish between safe state and failure state of CHSI. The critical loading coefficient of the reaction serves as the critical operational parameter which can determine the flood vulnerability, of the atmospheric storage tank. What is more, the flood vulnerability has been proved decreasing with the increase of the height of the storage tank and the density of the hazardous chemicals.
作者 魏彤彤 钱新明 袁梦琦 WEI Tong-tong QIAN Xin-ming YUAN Meng-qi(State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 1000811 China De- partment of Fire Protection Engineering, Chinese People's Armed Police Force Academy, Langfang 065000, Hebei, China)
出处 《安全与环境学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第6期19-23,共5页 Journal of Safety and Environment
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2011CB706904) 河北省高等学校科学研究计划项目(ZC2016093)
关键词 安全工程 化工装置 洪水灾害 脆弱性 风险评估 safety engineering chemical installation flood vulnerability risk assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

  • 1洪灾带来的化工事故[J].商品与质量,2010(37):30-31. 被引量:2
  • 2季学伟,翁文国,疏学明,申世飞,范维澄.城市事故灾难风险分析研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(11):119-124. 被引量:7
  • 3Cruz A M, Krausmann E. Hazardous-materials releases from offshore oil and gas facilities and emergency response following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2009, 22(1): 59 -65.
  • 4Young S, Balluz L, Malilay J. Natural and technologic hazardous material releases during and after natural disasters: A review [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2004, 322(1-3): 3-20.
  • 5Antonioni G, Bonvicini S, Spadoni G, et al. Development of a framework for the risk assessment of Na Tech accidental events [J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2009, 94(9) : 1442 - 1450.
  • 6Krausmann E, Cozzani V, Salzano E, et al. Industrial accidents triggered by natural hazards: An emerging risk issue [J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2011, 11(3): 921-929.
  • 7Pam U, Ale B. Guidelines for Quantitative Risk Assessment: Purple Book [M]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Committee for the Prevention of Disasters, 1999.
  • 8Cozzani V, Campedel M, Renni E, et al. Industrial accidents triggered by flood events: Analysis of past accidents [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 175(1 - 3) : 501 - 509.
  • 9刘丽川,蒲家宁.立式钢制储油罐抗浮分析[J].石油工程建设,2008,34(2):79-80. 被引量:5
  • 10潘红磊,张强斌,曾勇.事故状态下污染物排放对水环境影响的预测研究[J].油气田环境保护,2010,20(4):6-10. 被引量:4

共引文献6

同被引文献48

引证文献6

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部