可塑钛板与空心钉内固定治疗56例跟骨骨折患者的疗效对比

Plastic titanium plate and cannulated screw internal fixation treatment the curative effect of 56 patients with calcaneal fractures were compared

目的了解可塑钛板与空心钉内固定在跟骨骨折治疗中的各自疗效。方法选取56例跟骨骨折患者作对照组,给予可塑钛板治疗;另选取56例作研究组,给予经皮撬拨空心钉内固定治疗,对比两种疗法各自效果。结果研究组患者采用空心钉内固定治疗所用手术时间、术后半年Bohler角、Gissane角、术后完全负重时间、术后1年AOFAS评分等情况均优于对照组,组间比较差异显著(P<0.05)。结论经皮撬拨空心钉内固定治疗跟骨骨折复位效果好,属于有效、易推广的微创疗法。

objective To understand the plastic titanium plate and cannulated screw internal fixation in the treatment of bone fracture curative effect.Methods 56 patients with calcaneal fractures were selected as control group,give plastic titanium plate treatment;Another select 56 cases as a team,give percutaneous prying cannulated screw internal fixation treatment,compared to two kinds of therapy effect.Results the treatment group were treated by internal fixation with hollow nail six months after the operation time,used Bohler Angle,Angle of Gissane,postoperative weight-bearing time,postoperative AOFAS score 1 year completely,and so on and so forth were superior to control group,the more significant difference between groups（P〈0.05）.Conclusion percutaneous prying cannulated screw internal fixation treatment of bone fracture effect is good,belong to effective minimally invasive treatment,easy popularization.