针内针单纯腰麻和腰硬联合麻醉在剖宫产术中的麻醉效果对比分析

目的研究在剖宫产术中针内针单纯腰麻和腰硬联合麻醉的效果比较。方法对82例行剖宫产术的孕妇行针内针单纯穿刺,对患者的麻醉起效时间、术后疼痛评分指标进行记录,并与同期行腰硬联合麻醉的82例患者进行指标的对比评价。结果两组患者的疼痛评分以及麻醉起效时间等数据对比,呈现为P>0.05,表明统计学意义不存在,而对术后寒颤以及恶心等指标对比,行针内针单纯穿刺的发生率要高于另一组,数据对比呈现为P<0.05,而行腰硬联合麻醉的患者其术后不良反应发生率低于行单纯穿刺的患者。结论两种麻醉效果相对比较,并无显著差异性,因此临床建议根据患者的个人特点选择更合适的麻醉方式。

objective to study the needle in the simple lumbar hemp in cesarean section and waist hard joint anesthesia effect comparison. Methods 82 pregnant women underwent cesarean section in line needle puncture, pure anesthesia of the patients with effective index for recording time, postoperative pain score, and with the same period the waist hard joint anesthesia of 82 patients with indexes of evaluation. Results two groups of patients with pain score and the working time of anesthesia data contrast, appears as P〉 0.05, shows that statistical significance did not exist, and the postoperative shivering and disgusting indicators such as contrast, the incidence of inside line needle puncture alone than in the other group, the data contrast toP〈0.05, and the waist hard joint anesthesia in patients with postoperative lower incidence of adverse reactions to simple puncture patients. Gonclusion the two kinds of anesthesia effect is relative, and there was no significant difference, so the clinical recommendations according to patients＇ personal characteristics to choose more appropriate way of anesthesia.