期刊文献+

英语句子层级结构计量分析 被引量:6

A Quantitative Analysis of English Hierarchical Structure
原文传递
导出
摘要 语言作为一个复杂适应系统有着自身的演化和发展规律,采用计量方法可探究语言的系统特性。本文在依存句法的理论框架下,利用大规模依存树库,通过构建层级结构计量指标,如节点数、层级数、层级距离、平均层级距离和英语平均层级距离,对英语句子的层级结构进行了量化分析。结果发现,英语句子的节点数、层级数和平均层级距离三者存在显著的正相关;层级数的分布呈正偏态,表明英语句子倾向于采用扁平型层级结构,且节点数越大偏态越明显;英语平均层级距离的阈值为4。 As a complex adaptive system, language abides by certain laws in the course of evolution and development, which can be investigated through quantitative approaches. We use a large English dependency treebank to analyze the hierarchical structure of English sentences. Some particular measures such as vertice number ( VN ) , hierarchical number (HN) , hierarchical distance (HD) , mean hierarchical distance (MHD) and English mean hierarchi- cal distance ( MHD2 ) are introduced to evaluate the hierarchical structure of English sentences. We observe that there are significantly positive correlations between VN, HN, and MHD. A positive skew is also found in the distribution of HN, which indicates a preference for flatter structures in English sentences, and the skewness coefficient is increasing for more vertices. Furthermore, we propose a threshold below 4 for English MHD2.
作者 刘海涛 敬应奇 LIU Haitao JING Yingqi(School of International Studies, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)
出处 《外国语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第6期2-11,共10页 Journal of Foreign Languages
基金 国家社科基金重大项目"现代汉语计量语言学研究"(11&ZD188)
关键词 英语层级结构 复杂适应系统 依存句法 平均层级距离 English hierarchical structure complex adaptive system dependency grammar mean hierarchical distance
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献49

  • 1Chen, B.,Ning,A.,Bi, H. & S. Dunlap. Chinese subject - relative clauses are more difficult to process thanthe object - relative clauses [J]. Acta Psychologica, 2008, 129(1): 61 -65.
  • 2Clifton, C. & L. Frazier. Comprehending sentences with long - distance dependencies [ A]. G. M. Carlson &M. K. Tanenhaus. Linguistic Structure in Language Processing [ C ]. Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers.1989. 273 -217.
  • 3Demberg,V. & F. Keller. Data from eye - tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processingcomplexity [J ]. Cognition,2008,101 : 193 - 210.
  • 4Dryer, M. S. The Greenbergian word order correlations [ J]. Language, 1992, 68( 1 ) : 81 - 138.
  • 5Frazier, L. & d,F. Arcais. Filler - driven parsing: a study of gap filling in Dutch [ J]. Journal of Memoryand Language, 1989, 28: 331 -344.
  • 6Gibson, E. Linguistic complexity : locality of syntactic dependencies [ J]. Cognitiony\99S, 68: 1 -76.
  • 7Gibson, E. The dependency locality theory : A distance - based theory of linguistic complexity [A]. A. Mara-ntz,Y. Miyashita, & W. O’ Neil. Image, Language, Brain Cambridge [ C] . MA ; MIT Press,2000. 313 -353.
  • 8Greenberg, J. H. Some universals of language with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements[A] . Universals of Language [ C]. Cambridge : MIT Press,1963. 73 - 113.
  • 9Hale, J. A probabilistic early parser as a psycholinguistic model[ A]. Proceedings of the 2nd Conference of theNorth American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics [ C] . Pittsburgh,PA : Association forComputational Linguistics ( Volume 2) . 2001.159 - 166.
  • 10Hawkins, J. A. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars [ M] . Oxford: Oxford University Press,2004.

共引文献12

同被引文献85

引证文献6

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部