期刊文献+

一次性包皮环切术治疗小儿包茎、包皮过长的临床疗效观察 被引量:3

Clinical effect observation of one time circumcision in the treatment of children with phimosis and redundant prepuce
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察一次性包皮环切术治疗小儿包茎、包皮过长的临床疗效。方法选择2013年8月至2016年2月在我院进行诊治的包茎、包皮过长患儿240例,根据治疗方法的不同分为观察组与对照组,各120例。观察组给予一次性包皮环切治疗,对照组采用传统的包皮环切术进行治疗。结果观察组的手术时间、术中出血量与伤口愈合时间明显少于对照组,并发症发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论相比于传统包皮环切术,一次性包皮环切缝合器在小儿包茎、包皮过长治疗中能减少创伤,降低并发症的发生率,有很好的应用价值。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of one time circumcision in the treatment of children with phimosis and redundant prepuce. Methods From August 2013 to February 2016, 240 patients of children with phimosis and redundant prepuce in our hospital for diagnosis and treatment were selected. They were divided into observation group and control group according to the different treatment methods, with 120 cases in each group. The observation group was given one time circumcision, and the control group was treated with conventional circumcision. Results The operation time, intraoperative blood loss and healing time of the observation group were significantly less than those of the control group, and the incidence rate of complications was significantly lower than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). Conclusion Compared with the traditional circumcision, disposable circumcision suture device can reduce the trauma in the treatment of children with phimosis and redundant prepuce. It also can reduce the incidence of complications, which has a good value of application
出处 《临床医学研究与实践》 2016年第27期101-102,共2页 Clinical Research and Practice
关键词 传统包皮环切术 一次性包皮环切缝合器 包茎、包皮过长 traditional circumcision disposable circumcision suture device phimosis and redundant prepuce
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献49

  • 1孟庆喜,邢耀波,惠成仁.气囊扩张术治疗小儿包茎的临床观察[J].辽宁中医学院学报,2005,7(1):50-50. 被引量:10
  • 2张世杰,赵永明,郑三国,肖汉文,贺玉升.包皮过长与早泄相关性初步探讨[J].中华男科学杂志,2006,12(3):225-227. 被引量:46
  • 3程帆,夏樾,张孝斌.隐匿阴茎的研究进展[J].中国男科学杂志,2007,21(2):63-65. 被引量:20
  • 4梁朝朝,王克孝,陈家应,施浩强.合肥地区5172名男性青少年外生殖器疾病的流行病学调查[J].中华医学杂志,1997,77(1):15-17. 被引量:146
  • 5吴孟超,吴在德.黄家驷外科学[M].7版,北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:1329-1330.
  • 6Tacusch H W,Martinez A M,Partridge J C,et a 1.Painduring mogen or plastibell circumcision [J]. J perinatol,2002,22(3):214-218.
  • 7Ladenhauf HN,Ardelean MA,Schimke C,et al.Reduced bacterial colonisation of the glans penis after male circumcision in children—A prospective study.J Pediat Urol,2013,9(6 Pt B):1137-1144.
  • 8Keys C,Lam J PH.Foreskin and penile problems in childhood.Surgery(Oxford),2013,31(3):130-134.
  • 9Pintye J,Baeten JM,Manhart LE,et al.Association between male circumcision and incidence of syphilis in men and women:A prospective study in HIV-1 serodiscordant heterosexual African couples.Lancet Glob Health,2014,2(11):e664-671.
  • 10Nagdeve NG,Naik H,Bhingare PD,et al.Parental evaluation of postoperative outcome of circumcision with Plastibell or conventional dissection by dorsal slit technique:A randomized controlled trial.J Pediat Urol,2013,9(5):675-682.

共引文献42

同被引文献32

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部